TY - JOUR
T1 - Young Adults’ Experiences with Cannabis Retailer Marketing and Related Practices
T2 - Differences Among Sociodemographic Groups and Associations with Cannabis Use-related Outcomes
AU - Berg, Carla J.
AU - Romm, Katelyn F.
AU - LoParco, Cassidy R.
AU - Rossheim, Matthew E.
AU - Cui, Yuxian
AU - Platt, Elizabeth
AU - Yang, Y. Tony
AU - Wang, Yan
AU - Kasson, Erin
AU - Szlyk, Hannah S.
AU - McCready, Darcey M.
AU - Cavazos-Rehg, Patricia A.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© W. Montague Cobb-NMA Health Institute 2024.
PY - 2024
Y1 - 2024
N2 - Objectives: Limited cannabis retail surveillance has been conducted, particularly assessing retailer practices in relation to consumer sociodemographic factors or use-related outcomes. This study examined young adults’: exposure to promotions, health claims, warnings, and age restrictions at cannabis retailers; demographic correlates of retail exposures; and retail exposures in relation to use-related outcomes. Study Design: This study used the cross-sectional quantitative analysis. Methods: We analyzed 2023 survey data among 876 young adults in states with legal non-medical cannabis, reporting past-month cannabis use and past-year retailer visits. Results: In this sample (Mage = 27.1, 44.1% male, 31.7% sexual minority, 17.7% Black, 11.2% Asian, 25.1% Hispanic), 46.7% “at least sometimes” noticed free samples, 76.5% price promotions, 37.4% subpopulation-targeted promotions; 72.5% health claims on products/ads, 63.1% signage, and 70.5% from budtenders; 72.5% warnings on labels, 65.5% signage, and 38.9% from budtenders; and > 80% age verifications. Multivariable analyses identified sociodemographic correlates of exposure outcomes: greater promotion exposure was associated with Black race; greater health claim exposure with being heterosexual, Black, and less educated; less warning exposure with less education; and less age restriction exposure with being younger, male, and Black. Retail exposures were associated with use-related outcomes: more frequent cannabis use was associated with less health claim exposure; greater perceived social acceptability with greater promotion and age restriction exposure; greater perceived risk with greater warning and less age restriction exposure; more problematic use and driving after use with greater promotion and less age restriction exposure. Conclusions: Cannabis retail exposure disparities and their associations with use-related outcomes highlight the importance of regulatory and prevention efforts.
AB - Objectives: Limited cannabis retail surveillance has been conducted, particularly assessing retailer practices in relation to consumer sociodemographic factors or use-related outcomes. This study examined young adults’: exposure to promotions, health claims, warnings, and age restrictions at cannabis retailers; demographic correlates of retail exposures; and retail exposures in relation to use-related outcomes. Study Design: This study used the cross-sectional quantitative analysis. Methods: We analyzed 2023 survey data among 876 young adults in states with legal non-medical cannabis, reporting past-month cannabis use and past-year retailer visits. Results: In this sample (Mage = 27.1, 44.1% male, 31.7% sexual minority, 17.7% Black, 11.2% Asian, 25.1% Hispanic), 46.7% “at least sometimes” noticed free samples, 76.5% price promotions, 37.4% subpopulation-targeted promotions; 72.5% health claims on products/ads, 63.1% signage, and 70.5% from budtenders; 72.5% warnings on labels, 65.5% signage, and 38.9% from budtenders; and > 80% age verifications. Multivariable analyses identified sociodemographic correlates of exposure outcomes: greater promotion exposure was associated with Black race; greater health claim exposure with being heterosexual, Black, and less educated; less warning exposure with less education; and less age restriction exposure with being younger, male, and Black. Retail exposures were associated with use-related outcomes: more frequent cannabis use was associated with less health claim exposure; greater perceived social acceptability with greater promotion and age restriction exposure; greater perceived risk with greater warning and less age restriction exposure; more problematic use and driving after use with greater promotion and less age restriction exposure. Conclusions: Cannabis retail exposure disparities and their associations with use-related outcomes highlight the importance of regulatory and prevention efforts.
KW - Cannabis
KW - Health communication
KW - Health policy
KW - Marketing
KW - Public health
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85198507666&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s40615-024-02092-z
DO - 10.1007/s40615-024-02092-z
M3 - Article
C2 - 39009926
AN - SCOPUS:85198507666
SN - 2197-3792
JO - Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities
JF - Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities
ER -