TY - JOUR
T1 - World Heart Federation criteria for echocardiographic diagnosis of rheumatic heart disease-an evidence-based guideline
AU - Reméanyi, Bo
AU - Wilson, Nigel
AU - Steer, Andrew
AU - Ferreira, Beatriz
AU - Kado, Joseph
AU - Kumar, Krishna
AU - Lawrenson, John
AU - Maguire, Graeme
AU - Marijon, Eloi
AU - Mirabel, Mariana
AU - Mocumbi, Ana Olga
AU - Mota, Cleonice
AU - Paar, John
AU - Saxena, Anita
AU - Scheel, Janet
AU - Stirling, John
AU - Viali, Satupaitea
AU - Balekundri, Vijayalakshmi I.
AU - Wheaton, Gavin
AU - Zühlke, Liesl
AU - Carapetis, Jonathan
N1 - Funding Information:
5. Heart Foundation of New Zealand and Cardiac Society of Australia and New Zealand. New Zealand guidelines for rheumatic fever 1: diagnosis, management and secondary prevention. Heart Foundation [online] http://www.heartfoundation.org.nz/uploads/
Funding Information:
We acknowledge the support of RHDAustralia and Heart Association of Thailand in coordinating the investigators’ meeting. B. Reményi’s research position was funded by research scholarships from the National Heart Foundation of New Zealand and the Lowitja Institute of Australia. N. Wilson was funded part time by the Green Lane Research and Education Fund in 2010. L. Zühlke is supported by the NIH through the international clinical scholars and fellow program (R24 TW007988). Project grants were received from the Medtronic Foundation for the investigators’ meeting and from the Green Lane Research and Education Fund for the website development.
Funding Information:
4. National Heart Foundation of Australia and the Cardiac Society of Australia and New Zealand. Diagnosis and management of acute rheumatic fever and rheumatic heart disease in Australia —an evidence-based review. Heart Foundation [online] http://www.heartfoundation.org.au/
PY - 2012/5
Y1 - 2012/5
N2 - Over the past 5 years, the advent of echocardiographic screening for rheumatic heart disease (RHD) has revealed a higher RHD burden than previously thought. In light of this global experience, the development of new international echocardiographic guidelines that address the full spectrum of the rheumatic disease process is opportune. Systematic differences in the reporting of and diagnostic approach to RHD exist, reflecting differences in local experience and disease patterns. The World Heart Federation echocardiographic criteria for RHD have, therefore, been developed and are formulated on the basis of the best available evidence. Three categories are defined on the basis of assessment by 2D, continuous-wave, and color-Doppler echocardiography: 'definite RHD', 'borderline RHD', and 'normal'. Four subcategories of 'definite RHD' and three subcategories of 'borderline RHD' exist, to reflect the various disease patterns. The morphological features of RHD and the criteria for pathological mitral and aortic regurgitation are also defined. The criteria are modified for those aged over 20 years on the basis of the available evidence. The standardized criteria aim to permit rapid and consistent identification of individuals with RHD without a clear history of acute rheumatic fever and hence allow enrollment into secondary prophylaxis programs. However, important unanswered questions remain about the importance of subclinical disease (borderline or definite RHD on echocardiography without a clinical pathological murmur), and about the practicalities of implementing screening programs. These standardized criteria will help enable new studies to be designed to evaluate the role of echocardiographic screening in RHD control.
AB - Over the past 5 years, the advent of echocardiographic screening for rheumatic heart disease (RHD) has revealed a higher RHD burden than previously thought. In light of this global experience, the development of new international echocardiographic guidelines that address the full spectrum of the rheumatic disease process is opportune. Systematic differences in the reporting of and diagnostic approach to RHD exist, reflecting differences in local experience and disease patterns. The World Heart Federation echocardiographic criteria for RHD have, therefore, been developed and are formulated on the basis of the best available evidence. Three categories are defined on the basis of assessment by 2D, continuous-wave, and color-Doppler echocardiography: 'definite RHD', 'borderline RHD', and 'normal'. Four subcategories of 'definite RHD' and three subcategories of 'borderline RHD' exist, to reflect the various disease patterns. The morphological features of RHD and the criteria for pathological mitral and aortic regurgitation are also defined. The criteria are modified for those aged over 20 years on the basis of the available evidence. The standardized criteria aim to permit rapid and consistent identification of individuals with RHD without a clear history of acute rheumatic fever and hence allow enrollment into secondary prophylaxis programs. However, important unanswered questions remain about the importance of subclinical disease (borderline or definite RHD on echocardiography without a clinical pathological murmur), and about the practicalities of implementing screening programs. These standardized criteria will help enable new studies to be designed to evaluate the role of echocardiographic screening in RHD control.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84859735554&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1038/nrcardio.2012.7
DO - 10.1038/nrcardio.2012.7
M3 - Review article
C2 - 22371105
AN - SCOPUS:84859735554
SN - 1759-5002
VL - 9
SP - 297
EP - 309
JO - Nature Reviews Cardiology
JF - Nature Reviews Cardiology
IS - 5
ER -