Withholding Primary Pneumocystis Pneumonia Prophylaxis in Virologically Suppressed Patients with Human Immunodeficiency Virus: An Emulation of a Pragmatic Trial in COHERE

Andrew Atkinson, Marcel Zwahlen, Diana Barger, Antonella D'arminio Monforte, Stephane De Wit, Jade Ghosn, Enrico Girardi, Veronica Svedhem, Philippe Morlat, Cristina Mussini, Antoni Noguera-Julian, Christoph Stephan, Giota Touloumi, Ole Kirk, Amanda Mocroft, Peter Reiss, Jose M. Miro, James R. Carpenter, Hansjakob Furrer, Ali JuddRobert Zangerle, Giota Touloumi, Josiane Warszawski, Laurence Meyer, François Dabis, Murielle Mary Krause, Jade Ghosn, Catherine Leport, Linda Wittkop, Peter Reiss, Ferdinand Wit, Maria Prins, Heiner Bucher, Diana Gibb, Gerd Fätkenheuer, Julia Del Amo, Niels Obel, Claire Thorne, Amanda Mocroft, Ole Kirk, Christoph Stephan, Santiago Pérez-Hoyos, Osamah Hamouda, Barbara Bartmeyer, Nikoloz Chkhartishvili, Antoni Noguera-Julian, Andrea Antinori, Norbert Brockmeyer, Luis Prieto, Pablo Rojo Conejo, Antoni Soriano-Arandes, Manuel Battegay, Roger Kouyos, Jordi Casabona, Jose M. Miró, Antonella Castagna, Deborah Konopnick, Tessa Goetghebuer, Anders Sönnerborg, Carlo Torti, Caroline Sabin, Ramon Teira, Myriam Garrido, David Haerry, Jose M. Miró, Dominique Costagliola, Julia Del Amo, Amanda Mocroft, Dorthe Raben, Geneviève Chêne

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

12 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background: Using data from the COHERE collaboration, we investigated whether primary prophylaxis for pneumocystis pneumonia (PcP) might be withheld in all patients on antiretroviral therapy (ART) with suppressed plasma human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) RNA (≤400 copies/mL), irrespective of CD4 count. Methods: We implemented an established causal inference approach whereby observational data are used to emulate a randomized trial. Patients taking PcP prophylaxis were eligible for the emulated trial if their CD4 count was ≤200 cells/μL in line with existing recommendations. We compared the following 2 strategies for stopping prophylaxis: (1) when CD4 count was >200 cells/μL for >3 months or (2) when the patient was virologically suppressed (2 consecutive HIV RNA ≤400 copies/mL). Patients were artificially censored if they did not comply with these stopping rules. We estimated the risk of primary PcP in patients on ART, using the hazard ratio (HR) to compare the stopping strategies by fitting a pooled logistic model, including inverse probability weights to adjust for the selection bias introduced by the artificial censoring. Results: A total of 4813 patients (10 324 person-years) complied with eligibility conditions for the emulated trial. With primary PcP diagnosis as an endpoint, the adjusted HR (aHR) indicated a slightly lower, but not statistically significant, different risk for the strategy based on viral suppression alone compared with the existing guidelines (aHR,. 8; 95% confidence interval,. 6-1.1; P = .2). Conclusions: This study suggests that primary PcP prophylaxis might be safely withheld in confirmed virologically suppressed patients on ART, regardless of their CD4 count.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)195-202
Number of pages8
JournalClinical Infectious Diseases
Volume73
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 15 2021

Keywords

  • HIV-RNA
  • human immunodeficiency virus
  • pneumocystis pneumonia
  • prophylaxis

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Withholding Primary Pneumocystis Pneumonia Prophylaxis in Virologically Suppressed Patients with Human Immunodeficiency Virus: An Emulation of a Pragmatic Trial in COHERE'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this