Abstract
Epidemiological explanation often has a “black box” character, meaning the intermediate steps between cause and effect are unknown. Filling in black boxes is thought to improve causal inferences by making them intelligible. I argue that adding information about intermediate causes to a black box explanation is an unreliable guide to pragmatic intelligibility because it may mislead us about the stability of a cause. I diagnose a problem that I call wishful intelligibility, which occurs when scientists misjudge the limitations of certain features of an explanation. Wishful intelligibility gives us a new reason to prefer black box explanations in some contexts.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 824-834 |
| Number of pages | 11 |
| Journal | Philosophy of Science |
| Volume | 88 |
| Issue number | 5 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Dec 2021 |