Why identifying adverse events in paediatric emergency care matters

Kenneth A. Michelson, Richard T. Griffey

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

1 Scopus citations

Abstract

This study estimated the paediatric ED AE rate to be 3% of visits. In adult cohorts, AE reviews based on a broader trigger methodology have identified AE rates of 8%.7 One meta-analysis of mixed paediatric and adult populations by Stang et al found the range of AEs attributable to ED care to be 0.2%-6.0%.8 The wide range of AE rates in earlier studies highlights how decisions about the method of detection of AEs may influence reported rates. For example, the lower bound of 0.2% reported in Stang's analysis was based on voluntary error reports, which are known to severely underestimate AEs.

Original languageEnglish
Article numberbmjqs-2022-014939
JournalBMJ Quality and Safety
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - 2022

Keywords

  • adverse events, epidemiology and detection
  • emergency department
  • paediatrics

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Why identifying adverse events in paediatric emergency care matters'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this