What's in a context? Cautions, limitations, and potential paths forward

Shauna M. Stark, Zachariah M. Reagh, Michael A. Yassa, Craig E.L. Stark

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

34 Scopus citations

Abstract

The purpose of memory is to guide current and future behavior based on previous experiences. Part of this process involves either discriminating between or generalizing across similar experiences that contain overlapping conditions (such as space, time, or internal state), which we often conceptualize as “contexts”. In this review, we highlight major challenges facing the field as we attempt a neuroscience-based approach to the study of context and its impact on learning and memory. Here, we review some of the methodologies and approaches used to investigate context in both animals and humans, including the neurobiological mechanisms involved. Finally, we propose three tenets for operationalizing context in the experimental setting: 1) contexts must be stable over time along an experiential dimension; 2) contexts must be at least moderately complex in nature and their representations must be modifiable or adaptable, and 3) contexts must have some behavioral relevance (be it overt or incidental) so that its role can be measured.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)77-87
Number of pages11
JournalNeuroscience Letters
Volume680
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 27 2018

Keywords

  • Associations
  • Binding
  • Context
  • Hippocampus
  • Items

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'What's in a context? Cautions, limitations, and potential paths forward'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this