Abstract
Fisher's 'fundamental theorem of natural selection' is notoriously abstract, and, no less notoriously, many take it to be false. In this paper, I explicate the theorem, examine the role that it played in Fisher's general project for biology, and analyze why it was so very fundamental for Fisher. I defend Ewens (1989) and Lessard (1997) in the view that the theorem is in fact a true theorem if, as Fisher claimed, 'the terms employed' are 'used strictly as defined' (1930, p. 38). Finally, I explain the role that projects such as Fisher's play in the progress of scientific inquiry.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 59-82 |
| Number of pages | 24 |
| Journal | Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C :Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences |
| Volume | 37 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Mar 2006 |
Keywords
- Average effect
- Average excess
- Fundamental theorem
- Genetic variance
- Malthusian parameter
- Natural selection