“What Program Directors Think” V: Results of the 2019 Spring Survey of the Association of Program Directors in Radiology (APDR)

Anna Rozenshtein, Brent D. Griffith, Priscilla J. Slanetz, Carolynn M. DeBenedectis, Jennifer E. Gould, Jennifer R. Kohr, Tan Lucien Mohammed, Angelisa M. Paladin, Paul J. Rochon, Monica Sheth, Ernest F. Wiggins, Jonathan O. Swanson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Rationale and Objectives: The Association of Program Directors in Radiology (APDR) surveys its membership annually on hot topics and new developments in radiology residency training. Here we report the results of that annual survey. Materials and Methods: A web-based survey was posed to the APDR membership in the Fall of 2018. Members were asked 43 questions on program staffing, resident education resources/funding, impact of the integrated-Interventional Radiology residency program on Diagnostic Radiology program resources, resident interest in imaging informatics, Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education requirements on resident practice habits data reporting, institutional reliance on residents for clinical coverage, teaching format in the post-oral board era, resident conference attendance, confidentiality of the Match rank list, Early Specialization in Interventional Radiology pathway recruitment and selection, Diagnostic Radiology and Interventional Radiology program relationships, independent resident call, pediatric radiology training, diversity and unconscious bias training, and social media in radiology education. Results: Responses were collected electronically, results were tallied using Qualtrics software, and qualitative responses were tabulated or summarized as comments. There were 86 respondents with a response rate of 31.3%. Conclusion: Survey result highlights include perceived resident interest in imaging informatics with the vast majority of residency programs offering an informatics curriculum; the provision of resident practice habits data by nearly all residency programs despite lack of clarity surrounding this Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education requirement; continued use of case-taking in the post-oral boards era; frequent disclosure of the Match rank list to departmental and hospital administration; low penetration of unconscious bias training in academic radiology; and finally, the successful integration of interventional and diagnostic radiology training programs.

Original languageEnglish
JournalAcademic radiology
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - 2020
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • APDR
  • Program Director
  • Residency
  • Resident education
  • Survey

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of '“What Program Directors Think” V: Results of the 2019 Spring Survey of the Association of Program Directors in Radiology (APDR)'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this

    Rozenshtein, A., Griffith, B. D., Slanetz, P. J., DeBenedectis, C. M., Gould, J. E., Kohr, J. R., Mohammed, T. L., Paladin, A. M., Rochon, P. J., Sheth, M., Wiggins, E. F., & Swanson, J. O. (Accepted/In press). “What Program Directors Think” V: Results of the 2019 Spring Survey of the Association of Program Directors in Radiology (APDR). Academic radiology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acra.2020.06.035