What methods of scoring young children's spelling best predict later spelling performance?

Rebecca Treiman, Brett Kessler, Markéta Caravolas

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

30 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background: Children's spellings are often scored as correct or incorrect, but other measures may be better predictors of later spelling performance. Method: We examined seven measures of spelling in Reception Year and Year 1 (5–6 years old) as predictors of performance on a standardised spelling test in Year 2 (age 7). Results: Correctness was the best predictor of later spelling by the middle of Year 1, and it significantly outperformed a binary measure of phonological plausibility at the end of Reception Year. Nonbinary measures based on Levenshtein distance were significant predictors of later spelling in the middle of Reception Year and in children who produced no correct spellings. Some widely used scales performed less well with children who did not yet produce any correct spellings. Conclusions: Nonbinary measures of spelling performance can predict later spelling performance but for a more restricted period than anticipated based on many theories.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)80-96
Number of pages17
JournalJournal of Research in Reading
Volume42
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 1 2019

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'What methods of scoring young children's spelling best predict later spelling performance?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this