TY - JOUR
T1 - What learning a second language might teach us about auditory training
AU - Barcroft, Joe
AU - Sommers, Mitchell
AU - Tye-Murray, Nancy
PY - 2007/5/1
Y1 - 2007/5/1
N2 - In this article, we apply theory and research from the field of second language acquisition (SLA) to issues in auditory training for adults with postlingual deafness. Two areas of SLA theory and research are discussed. The first area concerns five hypotheses proposed by S. Krashen about SLA. We apply these hypotheses to issues in auditory training, such as the issue of using instructional techniques that promote development of implicit knowledge of target structures, the role of meaning-bearing comprehensible input, and the importance of creating an affectively positive learning environment. The second area concerns research on acoustic variability and second language (L2) learning. This research reinforces Krashen's hypothesis about attending to the nature of input during SLA, but does so with regard to how spoken input may be acoustically varied to facilitate acquisition. Studies have demonstrated that presentation formats with talker variability are effective for training learners on L2 phonemic contrasts and that presentation formats with talker, speaking-style, and speaking-rate variability (but not amplitude and fundamental-frequency variability) yield positive additive effects on L2 vocabulary learning. In light of these findings, we discuss how acoustically varied presentation formats may be used in auditory training.
AB - In this article, we apply theory and research from the field of second language acquisition (SLA) to issues in auditory training for adults with postlingual deafness. Two areas of SLA theory and research are discussed. The first area concerns five hypotheses proposed by S. Krashen about SLA. We apply these hypotheses to issues in auditory training, such as the issue of using instructional techniques that promote development of implicit knowledge of target structures, the role of meaning-bearing comprehensible input, and the importance of creating an affectively positive learning environment. The second area concerns research on acoustic variability and second language (L2) learning. This research reinforces Krashen's hypothesis about attending to the nature of input during SLA, but does so with regard to how spoken input may be acoustically varied to facilitate acquisition. Studies have demonstrated that presentation formats with talker variability are effective for training learners on L2 phonemic contrasts and that presentation formats with talker, speaking-style, and speaking-rate variability (but not amplitude and fundamental-frequency variability) yield positive additive effects on L2 vocabulary learning. In light of these findings, we discuss how acoustically varied presentation formats may be used in auditory training.
KW - Acoustic variability
KW - Explicit and implicit learning
KW - Input hypothesis
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=34247554136&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1055/s-2007-973441
DO - 10.1055/s-2007-973441
M3 - Review article
AN - SCOPUS:34247554136
SN - 0734-0451
VL - 28
SP - 151
EP - 162
JO - Seminars in Hearing
JF - Seminars in Hearing
IS - 2
ER -