TY - JOUR
T1 - What are parents willing to accept? A prospective study of risk tolerance in AIS surgery
AU - Harms Study Group Investigators
AU - Lonner, Baron
AU - Jain, Amit
AU - Sponseller, Paul
AU - Eaker, Lily
AU - Samdani, Amer
AU - Kelly, Michael
AU - Castillo, Andrea
AU - Marrache, Majd
AU - Ames, Christopher P.
AU - Shah, Suken A.
AU - Buckland, Aaron
AU - Samdani, Amer
AU - Jain, Amit
AU - Lonner, Baron
AU - Roye, Benjamin
AU - Yaszay, Burt
AU - Reilly, Chris
AU - Hedequist, Daniel
AU - Sucato, Daniel
AU - Clements, David
AU - Miyanji, Firoz
AU - Shufflebarger, Harry
AU - Flynn, Jack
AU - Asghar, Jahangir
AU - Pahys, Joshua
AU - Harms, Juergen
AU - Bachmann, Keith
AU - Lenke, Larry
AU - Abel, Mark
AU - Glotzbecker, Michael
AU - Kelly, Michael
AU - Vitale, Michael
AU - Marks, Michelle
AU - Gupta, Munish
AU - Fletcher, Nicholas
AU - Cahill, Patrick
AU - Gabos, Peter
AU - Newton, Peter
AU - Sturm, Peter
AU - Betz, Randal
AU - Lehman, Ron
AU - Parent, Stefan
AU - George, Stephen
AU - Hwang, Steven
AU - Shah, Suken
AU - Errico, Tom
AU - Upasani, Vidyadhar
AU - Mac Thiong, Jean Marc
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2020, Scoliosis Research Society.
PY - 2021/3
Y1 - 2021/3
N2 - Introduction: Surgical treatment of Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis (AIS) involves healthy individuals with spinal deformity. Parents are responsible for surgical consent on behalf of their children, a burden which causes trepidation and concern. Therefore, explanation of operative risk is a critical component of informed consent and parent decision-making. We set out to quantify parental risk aversion (RA). Methods: RA questionnaires were administered preoperatively to parents of 58 AIS patients undergoing spinal fusion (SF). RA is the likelihood of a parent to consent to their child’s SF (1- least likely, 10- most) with increasing allotments of data about potential complications at each stage (S1-complication named, S2-explained, S3-incidence given, S4-all information). A statistically significant mean difference in answers for each stage was assessed using paired sample t test or Wilcoxon rank t test. Normality was assessed by performing Shapiro–Wilk test. Results: AIS patients (age 14.2 years, 85% female, major curve 61°) were included. Mean scores for each of the stages were 4.4 ± 3.1, 4.9 ± 3.1, 6.5 ± 3.0, 6.6 ± 3.0, respectively. Highest and lowest RA were reported for death and infection, respectively. The greatest increase in likelihood to proceed with surgery was seen after education on malposition of implants and on death, 2.6 and 2.5, respectively (p < 0.001). The lowest increase in likelihood to proceed with surgery was seen after education on infection, 1.5 (p < 0.001). For all complications, there was an increase in parent willingness to proceed after providing descriptions and occurrence rate with a mean increase from S1 to S4 of 2.1 (95% CI 1.4–2.4), p < 0.001. Conclusion: As more detailed information was made available regarding potential complications with SF for AIS, parental RA toward surgery decreased and their willingness to proceed with surgery for their child improved.
AB - Introduction: Surgical treatment of Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis (AIS) involves healthy individuals with spinal deformity. Parents are responsible for surgical consent on behalf of their children, a burden which causes trepidation and concern. Therefore, explanation of operative risk is a critical component of informed consent and parent decision-making. We set out to quantify parental risk aversion (RA). Methods: RA questionnaires were administered preoperatively to parents of 58 AIS patients undergoing spinal fusion (SF). RA is the likelihood of a parent to consent to their child’s SF (1- least likely, 10- most) with increasing allotments of data about potential complications at each stage (S1-complication named, S2-explained, S3-incidence given, S4-all information). A statistically significant mean difference in answers for each stage was assessed using paired sample t test or Wilcoxon rank t test. Normality was assessed by performing Shapiro–Wilk test. Results: AIS patients (age 14.2 years, 85% female, major curve 61°) were included. Mean scores for each of the stages were 4.4 ± 3.1, 4.9 ± 3.1, 6.5 ± 3.0, 6.6 ± 3.0, respectively. Highest and lowest RA were reported for death and infection, respectively. The greatest increase in likelihood to proceed with surgery was seen after education on malposition of implants and on death, 2.6 and 2.5, respectively (p < 0.001). The lowest increase in likelihood to proceed with surgery was seen after education on infection, 1.5 (p < 0.001). For all complications, there was an increase in parent willingness to proceed after providing descriptions and occurrence rate with a mean increase from S1 to S4 of 2.1 (95% CI 1.4–2.4), p < 0.001. Conclusion: As more detailed information was made available regarding potential complications with SF for AIS, parental RA toward surgery decreased and their willingness to proceed with surgery for their child improved.
KW - Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis
KW - Risk aversion
KW - Spinal fusion
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85102536857&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s43390-020-00216-z
DO - 10.1007/s43390-020-00216-z
M3 - Article
C2 - 33048337
AN - SCOPUS:85102536857
SN - 2212-134X
VL - 9
SP - 381
EP - 386
JO - Spine deformity
JF - Spine deformity
IS - 2
ER -