Ventilatory control and supplemental oxygen in premature infants with apparent chronic lung disease

Ferdinand Coste, Thomas Ferkol, Aaron Hamvas, Claudia Cleveland, Laura Linneman, Julie Hoffman, James Kemp

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

16 Scopus citations


Objectives Our goal was to evaluate changes in respiratory pattern among premature infants born at <29 weeks gestation who underwent a physiological challenge at 36 weeks postmenstrual age with systematic reductions in supplemental oxygen and inspired airflow. Study design Subjects were all infants enrolled in the Prematurity and Respiratory Outcomes Project at St. Louis Children 's Hospital and eligible for a physiological challenge protocol because they were receiving supplemental oxygen or augmented airflow alone as part of their routine care. Continuous recording of rib cage and abdominal excursion and haemoglobin oxygen saturation (SpO2%) were made in the newborn intensive care unit. Results 37 of 49 infants (75.5%) failed the challenge, with severe or sustained falls in SpO2%. Also, 16 of 37 infants (43.2%) who failed had marked increases in the amount of periodic breathing at the time of challenge failure. Conclusions An unstable respiratory pattern is unmasked with a decrease in inspired oxygen or airflow support in many premature infants. Although infants with significant chronic lung disease may also be predisposed to more periodic breathing, these data suggest that the classification of chronic lung disease of prematurity based solely on clinical requirements for supplemental oxygen or airflow do not account for multiple mechanisms that are likely contributing to the need for respiratory support.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)F233-F237
JournalArchives of Disease in Childhood: Fetal and Neonatal Edition
Issue number3
StatePublished - May 1 2015


Dive into the research topics of 'Ventilatory control and supplemental oxygen in premature infants with apparent chronic lung disease'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this