Variability and misclassification of worker estimated hand force

A. M. Dale, A. E. Rohn, A. Patton, J. Standeven, B. Evanoff

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

8 Scopus citations

Abstract

Ergonomic studies often use worker estimated hand force reproduced on a dynamometer to quantify force exposures but this method has not been well-studied in real work settings. This study evaluated the validity of worker estimates of hand force in a field study and determined the misclassification of worker estimated hand force exposures compared to directly measured forces. Eight experienced sheet metal assemblers completed 1/4-inch diameter fastener installations using 6 different pneumatic tools. Grip forces were recorded by a pressure mat and were compared to worker estimated forces demonstrated on a dynamometer. Directly measured and worker estimated readings showed moderate correlations (0.53-0.67) for four installation tools and fair to moderate for two tools. The coefficient for variation of force estimates was 65% within repeated subject trials and 78% between averaged subject trials but 69% between subject trials during actual tool installations. Misclassification of worker estimated exposures varied by two cut-points: 29% using 4.0 kg and 49% using 6.0 kg. The force match procedure may provide adequate differentiation of high and low exposures in some settings, but is likely to result in substantial misclassification in other settings.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)846-851
Number of pages6
JournalApplied Ergonomics
Volume42
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 2011

Keywords

  • Exposure rating
  • Force measurement
  • Hand force

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Variability and misclassification of worker estimated hand force'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this