TY - JOUR
T1 - Validation of Immunotherapy Response Score as Predictive of Pan-solid Tumor Anti-PD-1/PD-L1 Benefit
AU - Bulen, Benjamin J.
AU - Khazanov, Nickolay A.
AU - Hovelson, Daniel H.
AU - Lamb, Laura E.
AU - Matrana, Marc
AU - Burkard, Mark E.
AU - Yang, Eddy Shih Hsin
AU - Edenfield, William J.
AU - Dees, Elizabeth Claire
AU - Onitilo, Adedayo A.
AU - Buchschacher, Gary L.
AU - Miller, Alan M.
AU - Parsons, Benjamin M.
AU - Wassenaar, Timothy R.
AU - Suga, Jennifer M.
AU - Siegel, Robert D.
AU - Irvin, William
AU - Nair, Suresh
AU - Slim, Jennifer N.
AU - Misleh, Jamal
AU - Khatri, Jamil
AU - Masters, Gregory A.
AU - Thomas, Sachdev
AU - Safa, Malek M.
AU - Anderson, Daniel M.
AU - Mowers, Jonathan
AU - Dusenbery, Anna C.
AU - Drewery, Stephanie
AU - Plouffe, Komal
AU - Reeder, Travis
AU - Vakil, Hana
AU - Patrias, Lynnae
AU - Falzetta, Amanda
AU - Hamilton, Ryan
AU - Kwiatkowski, Kat
AU - Johnson, D. Bryan
AU - Rhodes, Daniel R.
AU - Tomlins, Scott A.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 The Authors.
PY - 2023/7
Y1 - 2023/7
N2 - Immunotherapy response score (IRS) integrates tumor mutation burden (TMB) and quantitative expression biomarkers to predict anti-PD-1/PDL1 [PD-(L)1] monotherapy benefit. Here, we evaluated IRS in additional cohorts. Patients from an observational trial (NCT03061305) treated with anti-PD-(L)1 monotherapy were included and assigned to IRS-High (-H) versus -Low (-L) groups. Associations with real-world progression-free survival (rwPFS) and overall survival (OS) were determined by Cox proportional hazards (CPH) modeling. Those with available PD-L1 IHC treated with anti-PD-(L)1 with or without chemotherapy were separately assessed. Patients treated with PD-(L)1 and/or chemotherapy (five relevant tumor types) were assigned to three IRS groups [IRS-L divided into IRS-Ultra-Low (-UL) and Intermediate-Low (-IL), and similarly assessed]. In the 352 patient anti-PD-(L)1 monotherapy validation cohort (31 tumor types), IRS-H versus IRS-L patients had significantly longer rwPFS and OS. IRS significantly improved CPH associations with rwPFS and OS beyond microsatellite instability (MSI)/TMB alone. In a 189 patient (10 tumor types) PD-L1 IHC comparison cohort, IRS, but not PD-L1 IHC nor TMB, was significantly associated with anti-PD-L1 rwPFS. In a 1,103-patient cohort (from five relevant tumor types), rwPFS did not significantly differ in IRS-UL patients treated with chemotherapy versus chemotherapy plus anti-PD-(L)1, nor in IRS-H patients treated with anti-PD-(L)1 versus anti-PD-(L)1 + chemotherapy. IRS associations were consistent across subgroups, including both Europeans and non-Europeans. These results confirm the utility of IRS utility for predicting pan-solid tumor PD-(L)1 monotherapy benefit beyond available biomarkers and demonstrate utility for informing on anti-PD-(L)1 and/or chemotherapy treatment.
AB - Immunotherapy response score (IRS) integrates tumor mutation burden (TMB) and quantitative expression biomarkers to predict anti-PD-1/PDL1 [PD-(L)1] monotherapy benefit. Here, we evaluated IRS in additional cohorts. Patients from an observational trial (NCT03061305) treated with anti-PD-(L)1 monotherapy were included and assigned to IRS-High (-H) versus -Low (-L) groups. Associations with real-world progression-free survival (rwPFS) and overall survival (OS) were determined by Cox proportional hazards (CPH) modeling. Those with available PD-L1 IHC treated with anti-PD-(L)1 with or without chemotherapy were separately assessed. Patients treated with PD-(L)1 and/or chemotherapy (five relevant tumor types) were assigned to three IRS groups [IRS-L divided into IRS-Ultra-Low (-UL) and Intermediate-Low (-IL), and similarly assessed]. In the 352 patient anti-PD-(L)1 monotherapy validation cohort (31 tumor types), IRS-H versus IRS-L patients had significantly longer rwPFS and OS. IRS significantly improved CPH associations with rwPFS and OS beyond microsatellite instability (MSI)/TMB alone. In a 189 patient (10 tumor types) PD-L1 IHC comparison cohort, IRS, but not PD-L1 IHC nor TMB, was significantly associated with anti-PD-L1 rwPFS. In a 1,103-patient cohort (from five relevant tumor types), rwPFS did not significantly differ in IRS-UL patients treated with chemotherapy versus chemotherapy plus anti-PD-(L)1, nor in IRS-H patients treated with anti-PD-(L)1 versus anti-PD-(L)1 + chemotherapy. IRS associations were consistent across subgroups, including both Europeans and non-Europeans. These results confirm the utility of IRS utility for predicting pan-solid tumor PD-(L)1 monotherapy benefit beyond available biomarkers and demonstrate utility for informing on anti-PD-(L)1 and/or chemotherapy treatment.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85195428241&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1158/2767-9764.CRC-23-0036
DO - 10.1158/2767-9764.CRC-23-0036
M3 - Article
C2 - 37497337
AN - SCOPUS:85195428241
SN - 2767-9764
VL - 3
SP - 1335
EP - 1349
JO - Cancer research communications
JF - Cancer research communications
IS - 7
ER -