TY - JOUR
T1 - Utilization of Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy for Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma in the United States
AU - Shaaban, Sherif G.
AU - Verma, Vivek
AU - Choi, J. Isabelle
AU - Shabason, Jacob
AU - Sharma, Sonam
AU - Glass, Erica
AU - Grover, Surbhi
AU - Badiyan, Shahed N.
AU - Simone, Charles B.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2018 Elsevier Inc.
PY - 2018/9
Y1 - 2018/9
N2 - Although postoperative radiotherapy for malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) has historically been delivered using 3-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (RT) techniques, multiple reports show noteworthy safety and efficacy of the more advanced intensity-modulated RT (IMRT). We show that in the United States, IMRT is now the most commonly utilized adjuvant technique for MPM. Facility and regional differences might associate with IMRT delivery. Background: Although postoperative radiotherapy (RT) for malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) has historically been delivered using 3-dimensional conformal RT (3DCRT) techniques, multiple reports show noteworthy safety and efficacy of the more advanced intensity-modulated RT (IMRT). To our knowledge, this is the only known study to evaluate national practice patterns of IMRT utilization for MPM. Materials and Methods: The National Cancer Data Base was queried for newly-diagnosed MPM patients who underwent definitive surgery (extrapleural pneumonectomy [EPP] or extended pleurectomy/decortication [P/D]) followed by adjuvant RT. Patients with metastatic disease, non-EPP or P/D surgical techniques, and lack of RT receipt (or without specified RT technique) were excluded. Statistics included multivariable logistic regression, Kaplan–Meier overall survival (OS) analysis, and Cox proportional hazards modeling. Results: Overall, 286 patients met criteria (181 [63%] IMRT and 105 [37%] 3DCRT). Temporal trends revealed that although 3DCRT was more common at initial time periods, IMRT utilization rose from 2004 to 2007 and stayed as a relatively constant majority thereafter. This was also present when substratifying the cohort according to EPP versus P/D approaches. IMRT was more often delivered at academic centers, along with institutions in the Southern United States, whereas 3DCRT was more frequently utilized in community facilities and in the Northeast (P ≤.05 for all). RT technique did not affect OS (P >.05 for all comparisons). Conclusion: In the United States, IMRT is now the most commonly utilized adjuvant RT technique for MPM. Facility and regional differences might associate with IMRT delivery. The findings of this investigation have implications for insurance coverage, clinical referral patterns, and ongoing and future prospective trial design.
AB - Although postoperative radiotherapy for malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) has historically been delivered using 3-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (RT) techniques, multiple reports show noteworthy safety and efficacy of the more advanced intensity-modulated RT (IMRT). We show that in the United States, IMRT is now the most commonly utilized adjuvant technique for MPM. Facility and regional differences might associate with IMRT delivery. Background: Although postoperative radiotherapy (RT) for malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) has historically been delivered using 3-dimensional conformal RT (3DCRT) techniques, multiple reports show noteworthy safety and efficacy of the more advanced intensity-modulated RT (IMRT). To our knowledge, this is the only known study to evaluate national practice patterns of IMRT utilization for MPM. Materials and Methods: The National Cancer Data Base was queried for newly-diagnosed MPM patients who underwent definitive surgery (extrapleural pneumonectomy [EPP] or extended pleurectomy/decortication [P/D]) followed by adjuvant RT. Patients with metastatic disease, non-EPP or P/D surgical techniques, and lack of RT receipt (or without specified RT technique) were excluded. Statistics included multivariable logistic regression, Kaplan–Meier overall survival (OS) analysis, and Cox proportional hazards modeling. Results: Overall, 286 patients met criteria (181 [63%] IMRT and 105 [37%] 3DCRT). Temporal trends revealed that although 3DCRT was more common at initial time periods, IMRT utilization rose from 2004 to 2007 and stayed as a relatively constant majority thereafter. This was also present when substratifying the cohort according to EPP versus P/D approaches. IMRT was more often delivered at academic centers, along with institutions in the Southern United States, whereas 3DCRT was more frequently utilized in community facilities and in the Northeast (P ≤.05 for all). RT technique did not affect OS (P >.05 for all comparisons). Conclusion: In the United States, IMRT is now the most commonly utilized adjuvant RT technique for MPM. Facility and regional differences might associate with IMRT delivery. The findings of this investigation have implications for insurance coverage, clinical referral patterns, and ongoing and future prospective trial design.
KW - IMRT
KW - Patterns of care
KW - Pleurectomy
KW - Pneumonectomy
KW - Three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85047368486&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.cllc.2018.04.019
DO - 10.1016/j.cllc.2018.04.019
M3 - Article
C2 - 29803576
AN - SCOPUS:85047368486
SN - 1525-7304
VL - 19
SP - e685-e692
JO - Clinical Lung Cancer
JF - Clinical Lung Cancer
IS - 5
ER -