Utilization and Impact of Symptomatic and Exposure SARS-CoV-2 Testing in K-12 Schools

  • Jennifer E. Schuster
  • , Tyler R. Erickson
  • , Jennifer L. Goldman
  • , Daniel K. Benjamin
  • , M. Alan Brookhart
  • , Stephen Dewhurst
  • , Alex Fist
  • , John Foxe
  • , Maya Godambe
  • , Lisa Gwynn
  • , Susan M. Kiene
  • , Dana Keener Mast
  • , Corinne McDaniels-Davidson
  • , Jason G. Newland
  • , Eyal Oren
  • , Rangaraj Selvarangan
  • , Nidhi Shinde
  • , Tyler Walsh
  • , Treymayne Watterson
  • , Martin Zand
  • Kanecia O. Zimmerman, Ibukunoluwa C. Kalu

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention recommend that schools can offer severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) diagnostic (on-demand) testing for students and staff with coronavirus disease 2019 symptoms or exposures. Data related to the uptake, implementation, and effect of school-associated on-demand diagnostic testing have not been described. METHODS: The Rapid Acceleration of Diagnostics Underserved Populations Return to School program provided resources to researchers to implement on-demand SARS-CoV-2 testing in schools. This study describes the strategies used and uptake among the different testing programs. Risk of positivity was compared for symptomatic and exposure testing during the d and o variant periods. We estimated the number of school absence days saved with school-based diagnostic testing. RESULTS: Of the 16 eligible programs, 7 provided school-based on-demand testing. The number of persons that participated in these testing programs is 8281, with 4134 (49.9%) receiving >1 test during the school year. Risk of positivity was higher for symptomatic testing compared with exposure testing and higher during the o variant predominant period compared with the d variant predominant period. Overall, access to testing saved an estimated 13 806 absent school days. CONCLUSIONS: School-based on-demand SARS-CoV-2 testing was used throughout the school year, and nearly half the participants accessed testing on more than 1 occasion. Future studies should work to understand participant preferences around school-based testing and how these strategies can be used both during and outside of pandemics.

Original languageEnglish
Article numbere2022060352I
JournalPediatrics
Volume152
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 2023

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Utilization and Impact of Symptomatic and Exposure SARS-CoV-2 Testing in K-12 Schools'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this