Using robots at work during the COVID-19 crisis evokes passion decay: Evidence from field and experimental studies

Pok Man Tang, Joel Koopman, Hillary Anger Elfenbein, Jack H. Zhang, David De Cremer, Chi Hon Li, Elsa T. Chan

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    22 Scopus citations

    Abstract

    The growing trend of introducing robots into employees' work lives has become increasingly salient during the global COVID-19 pandemic. In light of this pandemic, it is likely that organisational decision-makers are seeing value in coupling employees with robots for both efficiency- and health-related reasons. An unintended consequence of this coupling, however, may be an increased level of work routinisation and standardisation. We draw primarily from the model of passion decay from the relationship and clinical psychology literature to develop theory and test a model arguing that passion decays as employees increasingly interact with robots for their work activities. We demonstrate that this passion decay leads to an increase of withdrawal behaviour from both the domains of work and family. Drawing further from the model of passion decay, we reveal that employees higher in openness to experience are less likely to suffer from passion decay upon more frequent interactions with robots in the course of work. Across a multi-source, multi-wave field study conducted in Hong Kong (Study 1) and a simulation-based experiment conducted in the United States (Study 2), our hypotheses received support. Theoretical and practical implications are discussed.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)881-911
    Number of pages31
    JournalApplied Psychology
    Volume71
    Issue number3
    DOIs
    StatePublished - Jul 2022

    Keywords

    • COVID-19
    • passion decay
    • robot

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Using robots at work during the COVID-19 crisis evokes passion decay: Evidence from field and experimental studies'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this