TY - JOUR
T1 - Using National Public Health Accreditation to Explore Quality Improvement and Performance Management in Small Local Health Departments
AU - Fifolt, Matthew
AU - Allen, Peg
AU - Crenshaw, Andrew
AU - Erwin, Paul C.
AU - Lang, Britt
AU - Thomas, Amy Belflower
AU - Brownson, Ross C.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.
PY - 2025/3/1
Y1 - 2025/3/1
N2 - Context: This article focuses on 4 small local health departments (LHDs) that were in the process of seeking Public Health Accreditation Board (PHAB) reaccreditation or Pathways Recognition using PHAB Standards & Measures Version 2022. Objective: The objective of this study was to explore the experiences of 4 small LHDs related to Quality Improvement (QI) and Performance Management (PM) in their pursuit of PHAB reaccreditation or Pathways Recognition. Design: A team of researchers conducted 22 qualitative interviews with health department leaders and staff. Findings relative to QI/PM represent an embedded case study since they were part of a larger investigation. Setting: The research team conducted interviews remotely with health departments located in the West and Midwest. Participants: Participants included adults at least 18 years old and employed in 1 of 4 health departments. Main Outcome Measures: Emergent themes from this qualitative investigation included using QI/PM tracking systems, building staff buy-in for QI/PM, integrating QI/PM into daily work, and advice for other health departments regarding QI/PM. Results: Participants suggested that tracking systems helped them manage QI/PM processes. Staff buy-in for QI/PM was strengthened by building a sense of ownership of the process and connecting improvement processes to outcomes. Health departments integrated QI/PM into daily work by leadership modeling and communicating expectations. Advice for other health departments included finding a QI system that was easy to follow and recognizing the role of QI/PM in improving performance to better support the wellbeing of the community. Conclusions: QI/PM are important tools for health department effectiveness. Participants affirmed that the primary purposes of QI/PM are to enhance internal processes and improve community health outcomes. Study findings demonstrate how 4 small health departments integrated QI/PM into their public health practice.
AB - Context: This article focuses on 4 small local health departments (LHDs) that were in the process of seeking Public Health Accreditation Board (PHAB) reaccreditation or Pathways Recognition using PHAB Standards & Measures Version 2022. Objective: The objective of this study was to explore the experiences of 4 small LHDs related to Quality Improvement (QI) and Performance Management (PM) in their pursuit of PHAB reaccreditation or Pathways Recognition. Design: A team of researchers conducted 22 qualitative interviews with health department leaders and staff. Findings relative to QI/PM represent an embedded case study since they were part of a larger investigation. Setting: The research team conducted interviews remotely with health departments located in the West and Midwest. Participants: Participants included adults at least 18 years old and employed in 1 of 4 health departments. Main Outcome Measures: Emergent themes from this qualitative investigation included using QI/PM tracking systems, building staff buy-in for QI/PM, integrating QI/PM into daily work, and advice for other health departments regarding QI/PM. Results: Participants suggested that tracking systems helped them manage QI/PM processes. Staff buy-in for QI/PM was strengthened by building a sense of ownership of the process and connecting improvement processes to outcomes. Health departments integrated QI/PM into daily work by leadership modeling and communicating expectations. Advice for other health departments included finding a QI system that was easy to follow and recognizing the role of QI/PM in improving performance to better support the wellbeing of the community. Conclusions: QI/PM are important tools for health department effectiveness. Participants affirmed that the primary purposes of QI/PM are to enhance internal processes and improve community health outcomes. Study findings demonstrate how 4 small health departments integrated QI/PM into their public health practice.
KW - accreditation
KW - local health department
KW - performance management
KW - public health accreditation board
KW - quality improvement
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85204156442
U2 - 10.1097/PHH.0000000000002062
DO - 10.1097/PHH.0000000000002062
M3 - Article
C2 - 39250699
AN - SCOPUS:85204156442
SN - 1078-4659
VL - 31
SP - 183
EP - 189
JO - Journal of Public Health Management and Practice
JF - Journal of Public Health Management and Practice
IS - 2
ER -