TY - JOUR
T1 - Use of cancer control referrals by 2-1-1 callers
T2 - A randomized trial
AU - Kreuter, Matthew W.
AU - Eddens, Katherine S.
AU - Alcaraz, Kassandra I.
AU - Rath, Suchitra
AU - Lai, Choi
AU - Caito, Nikki
AU - Greer, Regina
AU - Bridges, Nikisha
AU - Purnell, Jason Q.
AU - Wells, Anjanette
AU - Fu, Qiang
AU - Walsh, Colleen
AU - Eckstein, Erin
AU - Griffith, Julia
AU - Nelson, Alissa
AU - Paine, Cicely
AU - Aziz, Tiffany
AU - Roux, Anne M.
PY - 2012/12
Y1 - 2012/12
N2 - Background: Callers to 2-1-1 have greater need for and lesser use of cancer control services than other Americans. Integrating cancer risk assessment and referrals to preventive services into 2-1-1 systems is both feasible and acceptable to callers. Purpose: To determine whether callers will act on these referrals. Methods: In a randomized trial, 2-1-1 callers (n=1200) received standard service and those with at least one cancer risk factor or need for screening were assigned to receive verbal referrals only, verbal referrals + a tailored reminder mailed to their home, or verbal referrals + a telephone health coach/navigator. All data were collected from June 2010 to March 2012 and analyzed in March and April 2012. Results: At 1-month follow-up, callers in the navigator condition were more likely to report having contacted a cancer control referral than those receiving tailored reminders or verbal referrals only (34% vs 24% vs 18%, respectively; n=772, p<0.0001). Compared to verbal referrals only, navigators were particularly effective in getting 2-1-1 callers to contact providers for mammograms (OR=2.10, 95% CI=1.04, 4.22); Paps (OR=2.98, 95% CI=1.18, 7.54); and smoking cessation (OR=2.07, 95% CI=1.14, 3.74). Conclusions: Given the extensive reach of 2-1-1s and the elevated risk profile of their callers, even modest response rates could have meaningful impact on population health if proactive health referrals were implemented nationally.
AB - Background: Callers to 2-1-1 have greater need for and lesser use of cancer control services than other Americans. Integrating cancer risk assessment and referrals to preventive services into 2-1-1 systems is both feasible and acceptable to callers. Purpose: To determine whether callers will act on these referrals. Methods: In a randomized trial, 2-1-1 callers (n=1200) received standard service and those with at least one cancer risk factor or need for screening were assigned to receive verbal referrals only, verbal referrals + a tailored reminder mailed to their home, or verbal referrals + a telephone health coach/navigator. All data were collected from June 2010 to March 2012 and analyzed in March and April 2012. Results: At 1-month follow-up, callers in the navigator condition were more likely to report having contacted a cancer control referral than those receiving tailored reminders or verbal referrals only (34% vs 24% vs 18%, respectively; n=772, p<0.0001). Compared to verbal referrals only, navigators were particularly effective in getting 2-1-1 callers to contact providers for mammograms (OR=2.10, 95% CI=1.04, 4.22); Paps (OR=2.98, 95% CI=1.18, 7.54); and smoking cessation (OR=2.07, 95% CI=1.14, 3.74). Conclusions: Given the extensive reach of 2-1-1s and the elevated risk profile of their callers, even modest response rates could have meaningful impact on population health if proactive health referrals were implemented nationally.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84869418673&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.amepre.2012.09.004
DO - 10.1016/j.amepre.2012.09.004
M3 - Review article
C2 - 23157761
AN - SCOPUS:84869418673
SN - 0749-3797
VL - 43
SP - S425-S434
JO - American Journal of Preventive Medicine
JF - American Journal of Preventive Medicine
IS - 6 SUPPL.5
ER -