Uptake and costs of hypofractionated vs conventional whole breast irradiation after breast conserving surgery in the United States, 2008-2013

J. F. De Los Santos

doi:10.1016/j.breastdis.2015.07.024

Uptake and costs of hypofractionated vs conventional whole breast irradiation after breast conserving surgery in the United States, 2008-2013

Division of Clinical Research

Research output: Contribution to journal › Comment/debate

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	243-245
Number of pages	3
Journal	Breast Diseases
Volume	26
Issue number	3
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1016/j.breastdis.2015.07.024
State	Published - 2015

Access to Document

10.1016/j.breastdis.2015.07.024

Cite this

@article{3bccbb2259ce4acdbeef31323719b2b6,

title = "Uptake and costs of hypofractionated vs conventional whole breast irradiation after breast conserving surgery in the United States, 2008-2013",

author = "{De Los Santos}, {J. F.}",

year = "2015",

doi = "10.1016/j.breastdis.2015.07.024",

language = "English",

volume = "26",

pages = "243--245",

journal = "Breast Diseases",

issn = "1043-321X",

number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Uptake and costs of hypofractionated vs conventional whole breast irradiation after breast conserving surgery in the United States, 2008-2013

AU - De Los Santos, J. F.

PY - 2015

Y1 - 2015

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84942119414&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.breastdis.2015.07.024

DO - 10.1016/j.breastdis.2015.07.024

M3 - Comment/debate

AN - SCOPUS:84942119414

SN - 1043-321X

VL - 26

SP - 243

EP - 245

JO - Breast Diseases

JF - Breast Diseases

IS - 3

ER -

Uptake and costs of hypofractionated vs conventional whole breast irradiation after breast conserving surgery in the United States, 2008-2013

Access to Document

Other files and links

Cite this