Update to the structured MRI report for primary staging of rectal cancer: Perspective from the SAR Disease Focused Panel on Rectal and Anal Cancer

  • Zahra Kassam
  • , Rebecca Lang
  • , Supreeta Arya
  • , David D.B. Bates
  • , Kevin J. Chang
  • , Tyler J. Fraum
  • , Kenneth A. Friedman
  • , Jennifer S. Golia Pernicka
  • , Marc J. Gollub
  • , Mukesh Harisinghani
  • , Gaurav Khatri
  • , Elena Korngold
  • , Chandana Lall
  • , Sonia Lee
  • , Michael Magnetta
  • , Courtney Moreno
  • , Stephanie Nougaret
  • , Viktoriya Paroder
  • , Raj M. Paspulati
  • , Iva Petkovska
  • Perry J. Pickhardt, Hiram Shaish, Shannon Sheedy, Martin R. Weiser, Lisa Xuan, David H. Kim

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Objective: To review existing structured MRI reports for primary staging of rectal cancer and create a new, freely available structured report based on multidisciplinary expert opinion and literature review. Methods: Twenty abdominal imaging experts from the Society of Abdominal Radiology (SAR)’s Disease Focused Panel (DFP) on Rectal and Anal Cancer completed a questionnaire and participated in a subsequent consensus meeting based on the RAND-UCLA Appropriateness Method. Twenty-two items were classified via a group survey as “appropriate” or “inappropriate” (defined by ≥ 70% consensus), or “needs group discussion” (defined by < 70% consensus). Certain items were also discussed with multidisciplinary team members from colorectal surgery, oncology and pathology. Results: After completion of the questionnaire, 16 (72%) items required further discussion (< 70% consensus). Following group discussion, consensus was achieved for 21 (95%) of the items. Based on the consensus meeting, a revised structured report was developed. The most significant modifications included (1) Exclusion of the T2/early T3 category; (2) Replacement of the term “circumferential resection margin (CRM)” with “mesorectal fascia (MRF)”; (3) A revised definition of “mucinous content”; (4) Creation of two distinct categories for suspicious lymph nodes (LNs) and tumor deposits; and (5) Classification of suspicious extra-mesorectal LNs by anatomic location. Conclusion: The SAR DFP on Rectal and Anal Cancer recommends using this newly updated reporting template for primary MRI staging of rectal cancer. Graphical abstract: [Figure not available: see fulltext.].

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)3364-3374
Number of pages11
JournalAbdominal Radiology
Volume47
Issue number10
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 2022

Keywords

  • MRI
  • MRI rectum
  • Rectal cancer
  • Synoptic reporting

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Update to the structured MRI report for primary staging of rectal cancer: Perspective from the SAR Disease Focused Panel on Rectal and Anal Cancer'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this