Update on the immunological mechanisms of primary graft dysfunction and chronic lung allograft dysfunction

Jong Cheol Jeong, Andrew E. Gelman, Anita S. Chong

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

Abstract

Purpose of review Primary graft dysfunction (PGD) and chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD) are the leading causes of graft loss in lung transplant recipients. The development of mouse lung transplant models has allowed for the genetic dissection of cellular and molecular pathways that prevent graft survival. This review provides an overview into recent mechanistic insights into PGD and CLAD. Recent findings Mouse orthotopic lung transplant models and investigations of human lung transplant recipeints have revealed new molecular and cellular targets that promote PGD and CLAD. Donor and recipient-derived innate immune cells promote PGD and CLAD. PGD is driven by communication between classical monocytes and tissue-resident nonclassical monocytes activating alveolar macrophages to release chemokines that recruit neutrophils. Products of cell damage trigger neutrophil NET release, which together with NK cells, antibodies and complement, that further promote PGD. The development of CLAD involves circuits that activate B cells, CD8+ T cells, classical monocytes, and eosinophils. Summary Effective targeted management of PGD and CLAD in lung transplant recipient to improve their long-term outcome remains a critical unmet need. Current mechanistic studies and therapeutic studies in mouse models and humans identify new possibilities for prevention and treatment.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)412-419
Number of pages8
JournalCurrent opinion in organ transplantation
Volume29
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1 2024

Keywords

  • chronic lung allograft dysfunction
  • lung transplant
  • lung transplant immunology
  • primary graft dysfunction
  • transplant immunology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Update on the immunological mechanisms of primary graft dysfunction and chronic lung allograft dysfunction'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this