Unintended side effects of transformation are very rare in Cryptococcus neoformans

Ryan Z. Friedman, Stacey R. Gish, Holly Brown, Lindsey Brier, Nicole Howard, Tamara L. Doering, Michael R. Brent

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

5 Scopus citations

Abstract

Received wisdom in the field of fungal biology holds that the process of editing a genome by transformation and homologous recombination is inherently mutagenic. However, that belief is based on circumstantial evidence. We provide the first direct measurement of the effects of transformation on a fungal genome by sequencing the genomes of 29 transformants and 30 untransformed controls with high coverage. Contrary to the received wisdom, our results show that transformation of DNA segments flanked by long targeting sequences, followed by homologous recombination and selection for a drug marker, is extremely safe. If a transformation deletes a gene, that may create selective pressure for a few compensatory mutations, but even when we deleted a gene, we found fewer than two point mutations per deletion strain, on average. We also tested these strains for changes in gene expression and found only a few genes that were consistently differentially expressed between the wild type and strains modified by genomic insertion of a drug resistance marker. As part of our report, we provide the assembled genome sequence of the commonly used laboratory strain Cryptococcus neoformans var. grubii strain KN99α.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)815-822
Number of pages8
JournalG3: Genes, Genomes, Genetics
Volume8
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 1 2018

Keywords

  • Cryptococcus
  • Gene deletion
  • Genome sequence
  • Neoformans
  • Reverse genetics
  • Strain KN99
  • Yeasts

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Unintended side effects of transformation are very rare in Cryptococcus neoformans'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this