Unified versus divided enrollment in school choice: Improving student welfare in Chicago

  • Battal Doğan
  • , M. Bumin Yenmez

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    Abstract

    The Chicago Board of Education is implementing a centralized clearinghouse to assign students to schools since 2018-19 admissions. In this clearinghouse, each student can simultaneously be admitted to a selective and a nonselective school. We study this divided enrollment system and show that an alternative unified enrollment system, which elicits the preferences of students over all schools and assigns each student to only one school, is better for students when choice rules of schools are substitutable. If the choice rule of a school is not substitutable, then there exist student preferences such that at least one student strictly prefers the divided enrollment system to the unified enrollment system. Furthermore, we characterize the sources of inefficiency in the divided enrollment system when choice rules of schools are substitutable.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)366-373
    Number of pages8
    JournalGames and Economic Behavior
    Volume118
    DOIs
    StatePublished - Nov 2019

    Keywords

    • Market design
    • School choice
    • Unified enrollment

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Unified versus divided enrollment in school choice: Improving student welfare in Chicago'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this