Understanding Chronically Reported Families

  • Melissa Jonson-Reid
  • , Clifton R. Emery
  • , Brett Drake
  • , Mary Jo Stahlschmidt

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

80 Scopus citations

Abstract

Although a strong literature on child maltreatment re-reporting exists, much of that literature stops at the first re-report. The literature on chronic re-reporting, meaning reports beyond the second report, is scant. The authors follow Loman's lead in focusing on reports beyond the first two to determine what factors predict these "downstream" report stages. Cross-sector, longitudinal administrative data are used. The authors analyze predictors at each of the first four recurrences (first to second report, second to third report, third to fourth report, and fourth to fifth report). Findings demonstrate that some factors (e.g., tract poverty) which predict initial recurrence lose their predictive value at later stages, whereas others (e.g., aid to families with dependent children history) remain predictive across stages. In-home child welfare services and mental health treatment emerged as consistent predictors of reduced recurrence.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)271-281
Number of pages11
JournalChild Maltreatment
Volume15
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - 2010

Keywords

  • child welfare services/child protection
  • longitudinal research
  • risk assessment
  • services utilization (not mental health)

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Understanding Chronically Reported Families'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this