TY - JOUR
T1 - Unanswered Questions in Contemporary Heart Failure
AU - Gilstrap, Lauren G.
AU - Snipelisky, David
AU - AbouEzzeddine, Omar
AU - Vader, Justin
AU - Cooper, Lauren
AU - Kelley, Jacob
AU - Perez, Antonio
AU - Varian, Kenneth
AU - Lala, Anuradha
AU - Shah, Monica
AU - Stevenson, Lynne W.
N1 - Funding Information:
Funding: National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Heart Failure Network training grant (NIH/NHLBI U01HL084877).
Publisher Copyright:
© 2017 Elsevier Inc.
PY - 2017/10
Y1 - 2017/10
N2 - Objective The epidemiology of heart failure (HF) is changing. This study aimed to describe questions that arise during the routine care of HF patients that are unanswered by the current literature and describe how the type and focus of these questions has changed over time. Methods Investigators from the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute–sponsored Heart Failure Apprentice Network collected and categorized questions from 5 academic hospitals over 12 months. A total of 174 unanswered questions were collected and analyzed. Results Compared with 2004, there were more unanswered questions about “whether” to use therapies and fewer about “how” to use therapies. There were fewer questions about what therapeutic targets, therapy adjustment, and combination therapies. There were more questions about whether or how to stop therapies and how to add therapies back. Newly prominent topics, not observed in 2004, including novel therapeutics, refractory ventricular tachycardia, right heart failure, and nutrition/frailty, accounted for 24% of questions. Conclusions Compared with 2004, there are fewer unanswered questions about how to use, adjust, and combine therapies. There were more unanswered questions about whether and how to stop therapies. Almost 25% of unanswered questions dealt with topics indicative of more advanced disease which were not observed in 2004.
AB - Objective The epidemiology of heart failure (HF) is changing. This study aimed to describe questions that arise during the routine care of HF patients that are unanswered by the current literature and describe how the type and focus of these questions has changed over time. Methods Investigators from the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute–sponsored Heart Failure Apprentice Network collected and categorized questions from 5 academic hospitals over 12 months. A total of 174 unanswered questions were collected and analyzed. Results Compared with 2004, there were more unanswered questions about “whether” to use therapies and fewer about “how” to use therapies. There were fewer questions about what therapeutic targets, therapy adjustment, and combination therapies. There were more questions about whether or how to stop therapies and how to add therapies back. Newly prominent topics, not observed in 2004, including novel therapeutics, refractory ventricular tachycardia, right heart failure, and nutrition/frailty, accounted for 24% of questions. Conclusions Compared with 2004, there are fewer unanswered questions about how to use, adjust, and combine therapies. There were more unanswered questions about whether and how to stop therapies. Almost 25% of unanswered questions dealt with topics indicative of more advanced disease which were not observed in 2004.
KW - Heart failure
KW - epidemiology
KW - evidence based medicine
KW - treatment
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85027692842&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.cardfail.2017.06.009
DO - 10.1016/j.cardfail.2017.06.009
M3 - Article
C2 - 28689765
AN - SCOPUS:85027692842
SN - 1071-9164
VL - 23
SP - 770
EP - 774
JO - Journal of Cardiac Failure
JF - Journal of Cardiac Failure
IS - 10
ER -