TY - JOUR
T1 - UK AMD EMR USERS GROUP REPORT V
T2 - Benefits of initiating ranibizumab therapy for neovascular AMD in eyes with vision better than 6/12
AU - UK AMD EMR Users Group
AU - Lee, Aaron Y.
AU - Lee, Cecilia S.
AU - Butt, Thomas
AU - Xing, Wen
AU - Johnston, Robert L.
AU - Chakravarthy, Usha
AU - Egan, Catherine
AU - Akerele, Toks
AU - McKibbin, Martin
AU - Downey, Louise
AU - Natha, Salim
AU - Bailey, Clare
AU - Khan, Rehna
AU - Antcliff, Richard
AU - Varma, Atul
AU - Kumar, Vineeth
AU - Tsaloumas, Marie
AU - Mandal, Kaveri
AU - Liew, Gerald
AU - Keane, Pearse A.
AU - Sim, Dawn
AU - Bunce, Catey
AU - Tufail, Adnan
AU - Armstrong, Stewart
AU - Cazabon, Joey
AU - Mohamed, Quresh
AU - Sallam, Ahmed
AU - Zarranz-Ventura Hull, Javier
AU - Arora, Seema
AU - Cook, Helen
AU - Gopalakrishnan, Kala
AU - Lyon, Fiona
AU - Islam, Tahir
AU - Zaman, Naeem
AU - Backhouse, Oliver
AU - Dabbs, Tim
AU - Davies, Bryn
AU - Mokete, Bataung
AU - O'Neill, Damian
AU - Patel, Praveen J.
PY - 2015/8/1
Y1 - 2015/8/1
N2 - Background/aims To study the effectiveness and clinical relevance of eyes treated with good (better than 6/12 or >70 Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study letters) visual acuity (VA) when initiating treatment with ranibizumab for neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) in the UK National Health Service. Currently eyes with VA better than (>) 6/12 are not routinely funded for therapy. Methods Multicentre national nAMD database study on patients treated 3-5 years prior to the analysis. Anonymised structured data were collected from 14 centres. The primary outcome was the mean VA at year 1, 2 and 3. Secondary measures included the number of clinic visits and injections. Results The study included 12 951 treatment-naive eyes of 11 135 patients receiving 92 976 ranibizumab treatment episodes. A total of 754 patients had baseline VA better than 6/12 and at least 1-year of follow up. Mean VA of first treated eyes with baseline VA>6/12 at year 1, 2, 3 were 6/10, 6/12, 6/15, respectively and those with baseline VA 6/12 to >6/24 were 6/15, 6/17, 6/20, respectively (p values <0.001 for comparing differences between 6/12 and 6/12-6/24 groups). For the second eyes with baseline VA>6/12, mean VA at year 1, 2, 3 were 6/9, 6/9, 6/10 and those with baseline VA 6/12 to >6/24 were 6/15, 6/15, 6/27, respectively (p values <0.001-0.005). There was no significant difference in the average number of clinic visits or injections between those with VA better and worse than 6/12. Conclusions All eyes with baseline VA>6/12 maintained better mean VA than the eyes with baseline VA 6/12 to >6/24 at all time points for at least 2 years. The significantly better visual outcome in patients who were treated with good baseline VA has implications on future policy regarding the treatment criteria for nAMD patients' funding.
AB - Background/aims To study the effectiveness and clinical relevance of eyes treated with good (better than 6/12 or >70 Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study letters) visual acuity (VA) when initiating treatment with ranibizumab for neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) in the UK National Health Service. Currently eyes with VA better than (>) 6/12 are not routinely funded for therapy. Methods Multicentre national nAMD database study on patients treated 3-5 years prior to the analysis. Anonymised structured data were collected from 14 centres. The primary outcome was the mean VA at year 1, 2 and 3. Secondary measures included the number of clinic visits and injections. Results The study included 12 951 treatment-naive eyes of 11 135 patients receiving 92 976 ranibizumab treatment episodes. A total of 754 patients had baseline VA better than 6/12 and at least 1-year of follow up. Mean VA of first treated eyes with baseline VA>6/12 at year 1, 2, 3 were 6/10, 6/12, 6/15, respectively and those with baseline VA 6/12 to >6/24 were 6/15, 6/17, 6/20, respectively (p values <0.001 for comparing differences between 6/12 and 6/12-6/24 groups). For the second eyes with baseline VA>6/12, mean VA at year 1, 2, 3 were 6/9, 6/9, 6/10 and those with baseline VA 6/12 to >6/24 were 6/15, 6/15, 6/27, respectively (p values <0.001-0.005). There was no significant difference in the average number of clinic visits or injections between those with VA better and worse than 6/12. Conclusions All eyes with baseline VA>6/12 maintained better mean VA than the eyes with baseline VA 6/12 to >6/24 at all time points for at least 2 years. The significantly better visual outcome in patients who were treated with good baseline VA has implications on future policy regarding the treatment criteria for nAMD patients' funding.
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/84938751886
U2 - 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2014-306229
DO - 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2014-306229
M3 - Article
C2 - 25680619
AN - SCOPUS:84938751886
SN - 0007-1161
VL - 99
SP - 1045
EP - 1050
JO - British Journal of Ophthalmology
JF - British Journal of Ophthalmology
IS - 8
ER -