Type A and Type B attentional responses to aesthetic stimuli: Effects on mood and performance

  • Michael J. Strube
  • , Charles W. Turner
  • , Steven Patrick
  • , Richard Perrillo

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

14 Scopus citations

Abstract

Recent investigations of the Type A (coronary prone) behavior pattern have found that Type A's focus their attention on a central task and actively inhibit attention to peripheral distracting stimuli. This attentional difference has resulted in greater performance for Type A's than for Type B's (noncoronary prone behavior). However, research on aesthetic stimuli suggests that the focused attention of Type A's may not always be adaptive for solving frustrating cognitive tasks, particularly when paying attention to a peripheral stimulus could enhance performance by reducing negative emotions. Simple, predictable, aesthetic stimuli can have a soothing effect, which reduces negative emotions and enhances performance. The present study, conducted with 62 undergraduates (mean age 24 yrs) who had completed the Jenkins Activity Survey for Health Prediction, found that Type B's had improved affect and performance from attending to a soothing peripheral stimulus (simplex melodies) while working on a frustrating cognitive task (anagrams). Neither the performance nor the affect of Type A's was influenced by the simplex music, because they apparently suppressed paying attention to these melodies. (32 ref) (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2006 APA, all rights reserved).

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1369-1379
Number of pages11
JournalJournal of Personality and Social Psychology
Volume45
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1983

Keywords

  • performance, college students
  • Type A vs Type B attention responses to aesthetic stimuli, mood &

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Type A and Type B attentional responses to aesthetic stimuli: Effects on mood and performance'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this