TY - JOUR
T1 - Type 0 ulnar longitudinal deficiency
AU - Havenhill, Timothy G.
AU - Manske, Paul R.
AU - Patel, Archit
AU - Goldfarb, Charles A.
PY - 2005/11
Y1 - 2005/11
N2 - Purpose: To describe the characteristics of type 0 ulnar longitudinal deficiency (ULD) in which deficiencies are present in the hand and carpus without involvement of the forearm or elbow. Methods: A retrospective chart, radiograph, and clinical photograph review (1960-2005) of patients previously diagnosed with ectrodactyly, hand hypoplasia, or ULD was performed to evaluate for a diagnosis of ULD isolated to the hand. Results: Thirteen extremities were identified. Three extremities had complete absence of the small-finger ray (phalanges and metacarpal) and 6 extremities had complete absence of the ring- and small-finger rays. Four hands showed hypoplasia of the small finger, 3 in conjunction with a ring- and small-metacarpal synostosis and 1 in isolation. Three extremities also had radial-sided hypoplasia or aplasia of the rays. Additional common findings included simple syndactyly, delta phalanx, and carpal fusions, most commonly of the capitohamate joint. Conclusions: Patients with isolated ulnar-sided hand deficiency such as ectrodactyly of the ring and/or small fingers or synostosis of the small metacarpal of the ring finger in the presence of a normal forearm may be diagnosed as having type 0 ULD. We propose that type 0 be added to the current classification systems for ULD representing those extremities with deficiencies isolated to the hand.
AB - Purpose: To describe the characteristics of type 0 ulnar longitudinal deficiency (ULD) in which deficiencies are present in the hand and carpus without involvement of the forearm or elbow. Methods: A retrospective chart, radiograph, and clinical photograph review (1960-2005) of patients previously diagnosed with ectrodactyly, hand hypoplasia, or ULD was performed to evaluate for a diagnosis of ULD isolated to the hand. Results: Thirteen extremities were identified. Three extremities had complete absence of the small-finger ray (phalanges and metacarpal) and 6 extremities had complete absence of the ring- and small-finger rays. Four hands showed hypoplasia of the small finger, 3 in conjunction with a ring- and small-metacarpal synostosis and 1 in isolation. Three extremities also had radial-sided hypoplasia or aplasia of the rays. Additional common findings included simple syndactyly, delta phalanx, and carpal fusions, most commonly of the capitohamate joint. Conclusions: Patients with isolated ulnar-sided hand deficiency such as ectrodactyly of the ring and/or small fingers or synostosis of the small metacarpal of the ring finger in the presence of a normal forearm may be diagnosed as having type 0 ULD. We propose that type 0 be added to the current classification systems for ULD representing those extremities with deficiencies isolated to the hand.
KW - Ectrodactyly
KW - Metacarpal synostosis
KW - Ulnar clubhand
KW - Ulnar longitudinal deficiency
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=28844465168&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jhsa.2005.07.006
DO - 10.1016/j.jhsa.2005.07.006
M3 - Article
C2 - 16344190
AN - SCOPUS:28844465168
SN - 0363-5023
VL - 30
SP - 1288
EP - 1293
JO - Journal of Hand Surgery
JF - Journal of Hand Surgery
IS - 6
ER -