Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

"Truth" and "reconciliation" as social indicators

  • James L. Gibson

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    Abstract

    Countries throughout the world are trying to move toward a more democratic future through truth and reconciliation processes, under the assumption that truth causes reconciliation and that reconciliation contributes to democratization. But are "truth" and "reconciliation" concepts that can be measured rigorously and reliability? I present evidence in this article that each can be measured as an attribute of individuals, based on a large survey conducted in South Africa. My findings indicate that truth does indeed contribute to reconciliation. But because reconciliation is quite capable of changing (and likely to change) over time, efforts must be made to track levels of reconciliation as an important social indicator. Many countries in transition would profit greatly from implementing a Reconciliation Barometer to measure movement toward or away from the consolidation of democratic reform.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)257-281
    Number of pages25
    JournalSocial Indicators Research
    Volume81
    Issue number2
    DOIs
    StatePublished - Apr 2007

    Keywords

    • South African politics
    • Tolerance
    • Transitional justice
    • Truth commissions

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of '"Truth" and "reconciliation" as social indicators'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this