TY - JOUR
T1 - Trends in the Number of Lymph Nodes Evaluated Among Patients with Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors in the United States
T2 - A Multi-Institutional and National Database Analysis
AU - Sahara, Kota
AU - Tsilimigras, Diamantis I.
AU - Mehta, Rittal
AU - Moro, Amika
AU - Paredes, Anghela Z.
AU - Lopez-Aguiar, Alexandra G.
AU - Rocha, Flavio
AU - Kanji, Zaheer
AU - Weber, Sharon
AU - Fisher, Alexander
AU - Fields, Ryan
AU - Krasnick, Bradley A.
AU - Idrees, Kamran
AU - Smith, Paula M.
AU - Poultsides, George A.
AU - Makris, Eleftherios
AU - Cho, Cliff
AU - Beems, Megan
AU - Dillhoff, Mary
AU - Maithel, Shishir K.
AU - Endo, Itaru
AU - Pawlik, Timothy M.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2019, Society of Surgical Oncology.
PY - 2020/4/1
Y1 - 2020/4/1
N2 - Background: The role of routine lymphadenectomy in the surgical treatment of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (pNET) remains poorly defined. The objective of the current study was to investigate trends in the number of lymph nodes (LN) evaluated for pNET treatment at a nationwide level. Methods: Patients undergoing surgery for pNET between 2000 and 2016 were identified in the U.S. Neuroendocrine Tumor Study Group (US-NETSG) database as well as the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. The number of LNs examined was evaluated over time. Results: The median number of evaluated LNs increased roughly fourfold over the study period (US-NETSG, 2000: 3 LNs vs. 2016: 13 LNs; SEER, 2000: 3 LNs vs. 2016: 11 LNs, both p < 0.001). While no difference in 5-year OS and RFS was noted among patients who had 1–3 lymph node metastases (LNM) vs. ≥ 4 LNM between 2000–2007 (OS 73.5% vs. 69.9%, p = 0.12; RFS: 64.9% vs. 40.1%, p = 0.39), patients who underwent resection and LN evaluation during the period 2008–2016 had an incrementally worse survival if the patient had node negative disease, 1–3 LNM and ≥ 4 LNM (OS 86.8% vs. 82.7% vs. 74.9%, p < 0.001; RFS: 86.3% vs. 64.7% vs. 50.4%, p < 0.001). On multivariable analysis, a more recent year of diagnosis, pancreatic head tumor location, and tumor size > 2 cm were associated with 12 or more LNs evaluated in both US-NETSG and SEER databases. Conclusion: The number of LNs examined nearly quadrupled over the last decade. The increased number of LNs examined suggested a growing adoption of the AJCC staging manual recommendations regarding LN evaluation in the treatment of pNET.
AB - Background: The role of routine lymphadenectomy in the surgical treatment of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (pNET) remains poorly defined. The objective of the current study was to investigate trends in the number of lymph nodes (LN) evaluated for pNET treatment at a nationwide level. Methods: Patients undergoing surgery for pNET between 2000 and 2016 were identified in the U.S. Neuroendocrine Tumor Study Group (US-NETSG) database as well as the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. The number of LNs examined was evaluated over time. Results: The median number of evaluated LNs increased roughly fourfold over the study period (US-NETSG, 2000: 3 LNs vs. 2016: 13 LNs; SEER, 2000: 3 LNs vs. 2016: 11 LNs, both p < 0.001). While no difference in 5-year OS and RFS was noted among patients who had 1–3 lymph node metastases (LNM) vs. ≥ 4 LNM between 2000–2007 (OS 73.5% vs. 69.9%, p = 0.12; RFS: 64.9% vs. 40.1%, p = 0.39), patients who underwent resection and LN evaluation during the period 2008–2016 had an incrementally worse survival if the patient had node negative disease, 1–3 LNM and ≥ 4 LNM (OS 86.8% vs. 82.7% vs. 74.9%, p < 0.001; RFS: 86.3% vs. 64.7% vs. 50.4%, p < 0.001). On multivariable analysis, a more recent year of diagnosis, pancreatic head tumor location, and tumor size > 2 cm were associated with 12 or more LNs evaluated in both US-NETSG and SEER databases. Conclusion: The number of LNs examined nearly quadrupled over the last decade. The increased number of LNs examined suggested a growing adoption of the AJCC staging manual recommendations regarding LN evaluation in the treatment of pNET.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85076576190&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1245/s10434-019-08120-1
DO - 10.1245/s10434-019-08120-1
M3 - Article
C2 - 31838609
AN - SCOPUS:85076576190
SN - 1068-9265
VL - 27
SP - 1203
EP - 1212
JO - Annals of Surgical Oncology
JF - Annals of Surgical Oncology
IS - 4
ER -