TY - JOUR
T1 - Treatment preferences of patients with recurrent or metastatic cervical cancer
T2 - a discrete choice experiment in the US
AU - Thaker, Premal H.
AU - Lu, Hui
AU - Zhang, Yitong J.
AU - Trapali, Myrto
AU - Swinburn, Paul
AU - Krucien, Nicolas
AU - White, Doris
AU - Chaiprasert-Paguio, Joslyn
AU - Pothuri, Bhavana
AU - Ting, Jie
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2025 The Author(s)
PY - 2025/10
Y1 - 2025/10
N2 - Objective: This study assessed treatment preferences of patients with recurrent/metastatic cervical cancer, a disease with poor prognosis. Methods: A survey with two discrete choice experiments was completed by 150 patients with recurrent/metastatic cervical cancer in the US. Discrete choice experiment 1 included treatment attributes, and discrete choice experiment 2 included risk mitigation plan attributes. Results: Participants valued 12-month overall survival rate as the most important attribute, followed by disease control rate; both efficacy attributes were rated as more important than the risk of side effects such as peripheral neuropathy and corneal side effects. Participants’ willingness to accept a treatment profile requiring a risk mitigation plan was influenced by the number of clinic visits and out-of-pocket costs. Conclusions: Patients with recurrent/metastatic cervical cancer prioritize overall survival and disease control rate as the most important attributes. These findings can be used to inform shared decision-making and treatment discussions among patients, clinicians, and the care team.
AB - Objective: This study assessed treatment preferences of patients with recurrent/metastatic cervical cancer, a disease with poor prognosis. Methods: A survey with two discrete choice experiments was completed by 150 patients with recurrent/metastatic cervical cancer in the US. Discrete choice experiment 1 included treatment attributes, and discrete choice experiment 2 included risk mitigation plan attributes. Results: Participants valued 12-month overall survival rate as the most important attribute, followed by disease control rate; both efficacy attributes were rated as more important than the risk of side effects such as peripheral neuropathy and corneal side effects. Participants’ willingness to accept a treatment profile requiring a risk mitigation plan was influenced by the number of clinic visits and out-of-pocket costs. Conclusions: Patients with recurrent/metastatic cervical cancer prioritize overall survival and disease control rate as the most important attributes. These findings can be used to inform shared decision-making and treatment discussions among patients, clinicians, and the care team.
KW - Benefit-risk profile
KW - Cervical cancer
KW - Discrete choice experiment
KW - Financial burden
KW - Overall survival
KW - Patient preferences
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105016402190
U2 - 10.1016/j.gore.2025.101947
DO - 10.1016/j.gore.2025.101947
M3 - Article
C2 - 41036492
AN - SCOPUS:105016402190
SN - 2352-5789
VL - 61
JO - Gynecologic Oncology Reports
JF - Gynecologic Oncology Reports
M1 - 101947
ER -