Treatment planning for MR-guided SBRT of pancreatic tumors on a 1.5 T MR-Linac: A global consensus protocol

  • Guus Grimbergen
  • , Hidde Eijkelenkamp
  • , Louk M.W. Snoeren
  • , Rana Bahij
  • , Uffe Bernchou
  • , Erik van der Bijl
  • , Hanne D. Heerkens
  • , Shawn Binda
  • , Sylvia S.W. Ng
  • , Christelle Bouchart
  • , Zelda Paquier
  • , Kerryn Brown
  • , Richard Khor
  • , Robert Chuter
  • , Linnéa Freear
  • , Alex Dunlop
  • , Robert Adam Mitchell
  • , Beth A. Erickson
  • , William A. Hall
  • , Paola Godoy Scripes
  • Neelam Tyagi, Jeremiah de Leon, Charles Tran, Seungjong Oh, Paul Renz, Andrea Shessel, Edward Taylor, Martijn P.W. Intven, Gert J. Meijer

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

12 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background and purpose: Treatment planning for MR-guided stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for pancreatic tumors can be challenging, leading to a wide variation of protocols and practices. This study aimed to harmonize treatment planning by developing a consensus planning protocol for MR-guided pancreas SBRT on a 1.5 T MR-Linac. Materials and methods: A consortium was founded of thirteen centers that treat pancreatic tumors on a 1.5 T MR-Linac. A phased planning exercise was conducted in which centers iteratively created treatment plans for two cases of pancreatic cancer. Each phase was followed by a meeting where the instructions for the next phase were determined. After three phases, a consensus protocol was reached. Results: In the benchmarking phase (phase I), substantial variation between the SBRT protocols became apparent (for example, the gross tumor volume (GTV) D99% ranged between 36.8 – 53.7 Gy for case 1, 22.6 – 35.5 Gy for case 2). The next phase involved planning according to the same basic dosimetric objectives, constraints, and planning margins (phase II), which led to a large degree of harmonization (GTV D99% range: 47.9–53.6 Gy for case 1, 33.9–36.6 Gy for case 2). In phase III, the final consensus protocol was formulated in a treatment planning system template and again used for treatment planning. This not only resulted in further dosimetric harmonization (GTV D99% range: 48.2–50.9 Gy for case 1, 33.5–36.0 Gy for case 2) but also in less variation of estimated treatment delivery times. Conclusion: A global consensus protocol has been developed for treatment planning for MR-guided pancreatic SBRT on a 1.5 T MR-Linac. Aside from harmonizing the large variation in the current clinical practice, this protocol can provide a starting point for centers that are planning to treat pancreatic tumors on MR-Linac systems.

Original languageEnglish
Article number100797
JournalClinical and Translational Radiation Oncology
Volume47
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 2024

Keywords

  • Consensus protocol
  • MR-guided SBRT
  • Pancreatic cancer
  • Treatment planning

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Treatment planning for MR-guided SBRT of pancreatic tumors on a 1.5 T MR-Linac: A global consensus protocol'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this