TY - JOUR
T1 - Treatment Outcomes and Roles of Transplantation and Maintenance Rituximab in Patients with Previously Untreated Mantle Cell Lymphoma
T2 - Results from Large Real-World Cohorts
AU - Martin, Peter
AU - Cohen, Jonathon B.
AU - Wang, Michael
AU - Kumar, Anita
AU - Hill, Brian
AU - Villa, Diego
AU - Switchenko, Jeffrey M.
AU - Kahl, Brad
AU - Maddocks, Kami
AU - Grover, Natalie S.
AU - Qi, Keqin
AU - Parisi, Lori
AU - Daly, Katherine
AU - Zhu, Angeline
AU - Salles, Gilles
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© American Society of Clinical Oncology.
PY - 2023/1/20
Y1 - 2023/1/20
N2 - PURPOSECommonly used first-line (1L) treatments for mantle cell lymphoma include high-dose cytarabine-based induction followed by autologous stem-cell transplant (ASCT) for younger patients and several chemoimmunotherapy regimens for older patients. Continuous debates exist on the role of ASCT in younger patients and maintenance rituximab (MR) after bendamustine plus rituximab (BR).METHODSRetrospective data from 4,216 patients with mantle cell lymphoma in the Flatiron Health electronic record-derived deidentified database diagnosed between 2011 and 2021, mostly in US community oncology settings, were evaluated for treatment patterns and outcomes. The efficacy findings with ASCT and MR were validated in an independent cohort of 1,168 patients from 12 academic centers.RESULTSAmong 3,614 patients with documented 1L treatment, BR was the most used. Among 1,265 patients age < 65 years, 30.5% received cytarabine-based induction and 23.5% received ASCT. There was no significant association between ASCT and real-world time to next treatment (hazard ratio [HR], 0.84; 95% CI, 0.68 to 1.03; P =.10) or overall survival (HR, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.63 to 1.18; P =.4) among ASCT-eligible patients. Among MR-eligible patients, MR after BR versus BR alone was associated with a longer real-world time to next treatment (HR, 1.96; 95% CI, 1.61 to 2.38; P <.001) and overall survival (HR, 1.51; 95% CI, 1.19 to 1.92; P <.001). The efficacy findings were consistent in the validation cohort.CONCLUSIONIn this large cohort of patients treated primarily in the US community setting, only one in four young patients received cytarabine or ASCT consolidation, suggesting the need to develop treatments that can be delivered effectively in routine clinical practice. Together with the validation cohort, data support future clinical trials exploring regimens without ASCT consolidation in young patients, whereas MR should be considered for patients after 1L BR and rituximab plus cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone.
AB - PURPOSECommonly used first-line (1L) treatments for mantle cell lymphoma include high-dose cytarabine-based induction followed by autologous stem-cell transplant (ASCT) for younger patients and several chemoimmunotherapy regimens for older patients. Continuous debates exist on the role of ASCT in younger patients and maintenance rituximab (MR) after bendamustine plus rituximab (BR).METHODSRetrospective data from 4,216 patients with mantle cell lymphoma in the Flatiron Health electronic record-derived deidentified database diagnosed between 2011 and 2021, mostly in US community oncology settings, were evaluated for treatment patterns and outcomes. The efficacy findings with ASCT and MR were validated in an independent cohort of 1,168 patients from 12 academic centers.RESULTSAmong 3,614 patients with documented 1L treatment, BR was the most used. Among 1,265 patients age < 65 years, 30.5% received cytarabine-based induction and 23.5% received ASCT. There was no significant association between ASCT and real-world time to next treatment (hazard ratio [HR], 0.84; 95% CI, 0.68 to 1.03; P =.10) or overall survival (HR, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.63 to 1.18; P =.4) among ASCT-eligible patients. Among MR-eligible patients, MR after BR versus BR alone was associated with a longer real-world time to next treatment (HR, 1.96; 95% CI, 1.61 to 2.38; P <.001) and overall survival (HR, 1.51; 95% CI, 1.19 to 1.92; P <.001). The efficacy findings were consistent in the validation cohort.CONCLUSIONIn this large cohort of patients treated primarily in the US community setting, only one in four young patients received cytarabine or ASCT consolidation, suggesting the need to develop treatments that can be delivered effectively in routine clinical practice. Together with the validation cohort, data support future clinical trials exploring regimens without ASCT consolidation in young patients, whereas MR should be considered for patients after 1L BR and rituximab plus cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85143593969&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1200/JCO.21.02698
DO - 10.1200/JCO.21.02698
M3 - Article
C2 - 35763708
AN - SCOPUS:85143593969
SN - 0732-183X
VL - 41
SP - 541
EP - 554
JO - Journal of Clinical Oncology
JF - Journal of Clinical Oncology
IS - 3
ER -