TY - JOUR
T1 - Treatment of central venous in-stent restenosis with repeat stent deployment in hemodialysis patients
AU - Ronald, James
AU - Davis, Bradley
AU - Guevara, Carlos J.
AU - Pabon-Ramos, Waleska M.
AU - Smith, Tony P.
AU - Kim, Charles Y.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2017 Wichtig Publishing.
PY - 2017
Y1 - 2017
N2 - Purpose: To report patency rates for stent deployment for treatment of in-stent stenosis of the central veins of the chest in hemodialysis patients. Materials and methods: A retrospective analysis was performed on 29 patients who underwent 35 secondary percutaneous transluminal stent (PTS) deployments for in-stent stenosis within the central veins that were refractory to angioplasty and ipsilateral to a functioning hemodialysis access (in-stent PTS group). For comparison, patency data were acquired for 47 patients who underwent 78 successful percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) procedures for in-stent stenosis (in-stent PTA group) and 55 patients who underwent 55 stent deployments within native central vein stenosis refractory to angioplasty (native vein PTS group). Results: The 3-, 6-, and 12-month primary lesion patency for the in-stent PTS group was 73%, 57%, and 32%, respectively. The 3-, 6-, and 12-month primary patency for the in-stent PTA group was 70%, 38%, and 17% and for the native vein PTS group was 78%, 57%, and 26%, which were similar to the in-stent PTS group (p = 0.20 and 0.41, respectively). The 3-, 6-, and 12-month secondary access patency was 91%, 73%, and 65% for the in-stent PTS group. Sub-analysis of the in-stent PTS group revealed no difference in primary (p = 0.93) or secondary patency rates (p = 0.27) of bare metal stents (n = 23) compared with stent grafts (n = 12). Conclusions: Stent deployment for central vein in-stent stenosis refractory to angioplasty was associated with reasonable patency rates, which were similar to in-stent PTA and native vein PTS.
AB - Purpose: To report patency rates for stent deployment for treatment of in-stent stenosis of the central veins of the chest in hemodialysis patients. Materials and methods: A retrospective analysis was performed on 29 patients who underwent 35 secondary percutaneous transluminal stent (PTS) deployments for in-stent stenosis within the central veins that were refractory to angioplasty and ipsilateral to a functioning hemodialysis access (in-stent PTS group). For comparison, patency data were acquired for 47 patients who underwent 78 successful percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) procedures for in-stent stenosis (in-stent PTA group) and 55 patients who underwent 55 stent deployments within native central vein stenosis refractory to angioplasty (native vein PTS group). Results: The 3-, 6-, and 12-month primary lesion patency for the in-stent PTS group was 73%, 57%, and 32%, respectively. The 3-, 6-, and 12-month primary patency for the in-stent PTA group was 70%, 38%, and 17% and for the native vein PTS group was 78%, 57%, and 26%, which were similar to the in-stent PTS group (p = 0.20 and 0.41, respectively). The 3-, 6-, and 12-month secondary access patency was 91%, 73%, and 65% for the in-stent PTS group. Sub-analysis of the in-stent PTS group revealed no difference in primary (p = 0.93) or secondary patency rates (p = 0.27) of bare metal stents (n = 23) compared with stent grafts (n = 12). Conclusions: Stent deployment for central vein in-stent stenosis refractory to angioplasty was associated with reasonable patency rates, which were similar to in-stent PTA and native vein PTS.
KW - Central vein stenosis
KW - Occlusion
KW - Stent
KW - Stent graft
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85019651700&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.5301/jva.5000705
DO - 10.5301/jva.5000705
M3 - Article
C2 - 28430317
AN - SCOPUS:85019651700
SN - 1129-7298
VL - 18
SP - 214
EP - 219
JO - Journal of Vascular Access
JF - Journal of Vascular Access
IS - 3
ER -