Treatment decision-making in acute myeloid leukemia: a qualitative study of older adults and community oncologists

Kah Poh Loh, Maya Abdallah, Sindhuja Kadambi, Megan Wells, Anita J. Kumar, Jason H. Mendler, Jane L. Liesveld, Marsha Wittink, Kristen O’Dwyer, Michael W. Becker, Colin McHugh, Wendy Stock, Navneet S. Majhail, Tanya M. Wildes, Paul Duberstein, Supriya Gupta Mohile, Heidi D. Klepin

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

5 Scopus citations

Abstract

Little is known about the characteristics of patients, physicians, and organizations that influence treatment decisions in older patients with AML. We conducted qualitative interviews with community oncologists and older patients with AML to elicit factors that influence their treatment decision-making. Recruitment was done via purposive sampling and continued until theoretical saturation was reached, resulting in the inclusion of 15 patients and 15 oncologists. Participants’ responses were analyzed using directed content analysis. Oncologists and patients considered comorbidities, functional status, emotional health, cognition, and social factors when deciding treatment; most oncologists evaluated these using clinical gestalt. Sixty-seven percent of patients perceived that treatment was their only option and that they had not been offered a choice. In conclusion, treatment decision-making is complex and influenced by patient-related factors. These factors can be assessed as part of a geriatric assessment which can help oncologists better determine fitness and guide treatment decision-making.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)387-398
Number of pages12
JournalLeukemia and Lymphoma
Volume62
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - 2021

Keywords

  • Treatment decision-making
  • acute myeloid leukemia
  • geriatric hematology
  • older adults

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Treatment decision-making in acute myeloid leukemia: a qualitative study of older adults and community oncologists'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this