Translating evidence into population health improvement: Strategies and barriers

Steven H. Woolf, Jason Q. Purnell, Sarah M. Simon, Emily B. Zimmerman, Gabriela J. Camberos, Amber Haley, Robert P. Fields

    Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

    100 Scopus citations

    Abstract

    Among the challenges facing research translation - the effort to move evidence into policy and practice - is that key questions chosen by investigators and funders may not always align with the information priorities of decision makers, nor are the findings always presented in a form that is useful for or relevant to the decisions at hand. This disconnect is a problem particularly for population health, where the change agents who can make the biggest difference in improving health behaviors and social and environmental conditions are generally nonscientists outside of the health professions. To persuade an audience that does not read scientific journals, strong science may not be enough to elicit change. Achieving influence in population health often requires four ingredients for success: research that is responsive to user needs, an understanding of the decision-making environment, effective stakeholder engagement, and strategic communication. This article reviews the principles and provides examples from a national and local initiative.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)463-482
    Number of pages20
    JournalAnnual Review of Public Health
    Volume36
    DOIs
    StatePublished - Mar 18 2015

    Keywords

    • Community engagement
    • Dissemination and implementation
    • Health-in-all policies
    • Public health policy
    • Research translation

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Translating evidence into population health improvement: Strategies and barriers'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this