TY - GEN
T1 - Towards Geo-Culturally Grounded LLM Generations
AU - Lertvittayakumjorn, Piyawat
AU - Kinney, David
AU - Prabhakaran, Vinodkumar
AU - Martin, Donald
AU - Dev, Sunipa
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
©2025 Association for Computational Linguistics.
PY - 2025
Y1 - 2025
N2 - Generative large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated gaps in diverse cultural awareness across the globe. We investigate the effect of retrieval augmented generation and search-grounding techniques on LLMs’ ability to display familiarity with various national cultures. Specifically, we compare the performance of standard LLMs, LLMs augmented with retrievals from a bespoke knowledge base (i.e., KB grounding), and LLMs augmented with retrievals from a web search (i.e., search grounding) on multiple cultural awareness benchmarks. We find that search grounding significantly improves the LLM performance on multiple-choice benchmarks that test propositional knowledge (e.g., cultural norms, artifacts, and institutions), while KB grounding’s effectiveness is limited by inadequate knowledge base coverage and a suboptimal retriever. However, search grounding also increases the risk of stereotypical judgments by language models and fails to improve evaluators’ judgments of cultural familiarity in a human evaluation with adequate statistical power. These results highlight the distinction between propositional cultural knowledge and open-ended cultural fluency when it comes to evaluating LLMs’ cultural awareness.
AB - Generative large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated gaps in diverse cultural awareness across the globe. We investigate the effect of retrieval augmented generation and search-grounding techniques on LLMs’ ability to display familiarity with various national cultures. Specifically, we compare the performance of standard LLMs, LLMs augmented with retrievals from a bespoke knowledge base (i.e., KB grounding), and LLMs augmented with retrievals from a web search (i.e., search grounding) on multiple cultural awareness benchmarks. We find that search grounding significantly improves the LLM performance on multiple-choice benchmarks that test propositional knowledge (e.g., cultural norms, artifacts, and institutions), while KB grounding’s effectiveness is limited by inadequate knowledge base coverage and a suboptimal retriever. However, search grounding also increases the risk of stereotypical judgments by language models and fails to improve evaluators’ judgments of cultural familiarity in a human evaluation with adequate statistical power. These results highlight the distinction between propositional cultural knowledge and open-ended cultural fluency when it comes to evaluating LLMs’ cultural awareness.
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105020379604
U2 - 10.18653/v1/2025.acl-short.26
DO - 10.18653/v1/2025.acl-short.26
M3 - Conference contribution
AN - SCOPUS:105020379604
T3 - Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics
SP - 313
EP - 330
BT - Short Papers
A2 - Che, Wanxiang
A2 - Nabende, Joyce
A2 - Shutova, Ekaterina
A2 - Pilehvar, Mohammad Taher
A2 - Pilehvar, Mohammad Taher
PB - Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL)
T2 - 63rd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, ACL 2025
Y2 - 27 July 2025 through 1 August 2025
ER -