TY - JOUR
T1 - Toward rational use of repeat imaging in children with mild traumatic brain injuries and intracranial injuries
AU - Johnson, Gabrielle W.
AU - Greenberg, Jacob K.
AU - Hale, Andrew T.
AU - Ahluwalia, Ranbir
AU - Hill, Madelyn
AU - Belal, Ahmed
AU - Baygani, Shawyon
AU - Foraker, Randi E.
AU - Carpenter, Christopher
AU - Yan, Yan
AU - Ackerman, Laurie L.
AU - Noje, Corina
AU - Jackson, Eric
AU - Burns, Erin C.
AU - Sayama, Christina M.
AU - Selden, Nathan R.
AU - Vachhrajani, Shobhan
AU - Shannon, Chevis N.
AU - Kuppermann, Nathan
AU - Limbrick, Dave
N1 - Funding Information:
This study was funded by grants from the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (1F32HS027075-01A1) and the Thrasher Research Fund (15024). Research reported in this publication was supported by the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences of the National Institutes of Health under award no. TL1TR002344. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health.
Funding Information:
Dr. Kuppermann reported grants from NIH, HRSA, and PCORI, outside the submitted work. Dr. Limbrick reported grants from
Publisher Copyright:
©AANS 2023.
PY - 2023/7
Y1 - 2023/7
N2 - OBJECTIVE Limited evidence exists on the utility of repeat neuroimaging in children with mild traumatic brain injuries (mTBIs) and intracranial injuries (ICIs). Here, the authors identified factors associated with repeat neuroimaging and predictors of hemorrhage progression and/or neurosurgical intervention. METHODS The authors performed a multicenter, retrospective cohort study of children at four centers of the Pediatric TBI Research Consortium. All patients were ≤ 18 years and presented within 24 hours of injury with a Glasgow Coma Scale score of 13-15 and evidence of ICI on neuroimaging. The outcomes of interest were 1) whether patients underwent repeat neuroimaging during index admission, and 2) a composite outcome of progression of previously identified hemorrhage ≥ 25% and/or repeat imaging as an indication for subsequent neurosurgical intervention. The authors performed multivariable logistic regression and report odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals. RESULTS A total of 1324 patients met inclusion criteria; 41.3% of patients underwent repeat imaging. Repeat imaging was associated with clinical change in 4.8% of patients; the remainder of the imaging tests were for routine surveillance (90.9%) or of unclear prompting (4.4%). In 2.6% of patients, repeat imaging findings were reported as an indication for neurosurgical intervention. While many factors were associated with repeat neuroimaging, only epidural hematoma (OR 3.99, 95% CI 2.22-7.15), posttraumatic seizures (OR 2.95, 95% CI 1.22-7.41), and age ≥ 2 years (OR 2.25, 95% CI 1.16-4.36) were significant predictors of hemorrhage progression and/or neurosurgery. Of patients without any of these risk factors, none underwent neurosurgical intervention. CONCLUSIONS Repeat neuroimaging was commonly used but uncommonly associated with clinical deterioration. Although several factors were associated with repeat neuroimaging, only posttraumatic seizures, age ≥ 2 years, and epidural hematoma were significant predictors of hemorrhage progression and/or neurosurgery. These results provide the foundation for evidence-based repeat neuroimaging practices in children with mTBI and ICI.
AB - OBJECTIVE Limited evidence exists on the utility of repeat neuroimaging in children with mild traumatic brain injuries (mTBIs) and intracranial injuries (ICIs). Here, the authors identified factors associated with repeat neuroimaging and predictors of hemorrhage progression and/or neurosurgical intervention. METHODS The authors performed a multicenter, retrospective cohort study of children at four centers of the Pediatric TBI Research Consortium. All patients were ≤ 18 years and presented within 24 hours of injury with a Glasgow Coma Scale score of 13-15 and evidence of ICI on neuroimaging. The outcomes of interest were 1) whether patients underwent repeat neuroimaging during index admission, and 2) a composite outcome of progression of previously identified hemorrhage ≥ 25% and/or repeat imaging as an indication for subsequent neurosurgical intervention. The authors performed multivariable logistic regression and report odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals. RESULTS A total of 1324 patients met inclusion criteria; 41.3% of patients underwent repeat imaging. Repeat imaging was associated with clinical change in 4.8% of patients; the remainder of the imaging tests were for routine surveillance (90.9%) or of unclear prompting (4.4%). In 2.6% of patients, repeat imaging findings were reported as an indication for neurosurgical intervention. While many factors were associated with repeat neuroimaging, only epidural hematoma (OR 3.99, 95% CI 2.22-7.15), posttraumatic seizures (OR 2.95, 95% CI 1.22-7.41), and age ≥ 2 years (OR 2.25, 95% CI 1.16-4.36) were significant predictors of hemorrhage progression and/or neurosurgery. Of patients without any of these risk factors, none underwent neurosurgical intervention. CONCLUSIONS Repeat neuroimaging was commonly used but uncommonly associated with clinical deterioration. Although several factors were associated with repeat neuroimaging, only posttraumatic seizures, age ≥ 2 years, and epidural hematoma were significant predictors of hemorrhage progression and/or neurosurgery. These results provide the foundation for evidence-based repeat neuroimaging practices in children with mTBI and ICI.
KW - emergency medicine
KW - imaging overuse
KW - mild traumatic brain injury
KW - repeat imaging
KW - trauma
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85164234192&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.3171/2023.2.PEDS22393
DO - 10.3171/2023.2.PEDS22393
M3 - Article
C2 - 37021760
AN - SCOPUS:85164234192
SN - 1933-0707
VL - 32
SP - 26
EP - 34
JO - Journal of Neurosurgery: Pediatrics
JF - Journal of Neurosurgery: Pediatrics
IS - 1
ER -