To list or not to list? the value and detriment of freelisting in ethnobotanical studies

Narel Y.Paniagua Zambrana, Rainer W. Bussmann, Robbie E. Hart, Araceli L.Moya Huanca, Gere Ortiz Soria, Milton Ortiz Vaca, David Ortiz Álvarez, Jorge Soria Morán, María Soria Morán, Saúl Chávez, Bertha Chávez Moreno, Gualberto Chávez Moreno, Oscar Roca, Erlin Siripi

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

27 Scopus citations

Abstract

Although freelisting and semi-structured interviews are widespread methods in ethnobotany, few studies quantitatively examine how these methods may bias results. Using a comprehensive ethnobotanical inventory of palm species, uses and names in the Chácobo tribe of Bolivia, we show that interviews elicit more items than freelists, but the effect is sensitive to sample size, item type and data categorization. This implies that even subtle methodological choices may greatly affect reported results.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)201-204
Number of pages4
JournalNature Plants
Volume4
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 1 2018

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'To list or not to list? the value and detriment of freelisting in ethnobotanical studies'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this