Abstract
To the Editor: For many, the important message of the TIMI Phase II trial (March 9 issue)1 is not so much that the use of a conservative strategy after thrombolysis was vindicated, but that acute myocardial infarction could be treated in 3262 patients, approximately two thirds of whom were in a not-low-risk category, with a six-week mortality rate of under 5 percent. It is, however, difficult to interpret the results of the substudy of intravenous beta-blockade, a treatment that had been investigated extensively during the decade before the introduction of thrombolysis2,3 and that experimental evidence had suggested should be more.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 612 |
| Number of pages | 1 |
| Journal | New England Journal of Medicine |
| Volume | 321 |
| Issue number | 9 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Aug 31 1989 |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) Phase II Trial'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver