TY - JOUR
T1 - The variable nature of cognitive control
T2 - A dual mechanisms framework
AU - Braver, Todd S.
N1 - Funding Information:
This work was supported by NIH R01 MH66078. Thanks to Greg Burgess, Koji Jimura and Bethany Edwards for their contributions to the work described here, and to the rest of the Cognitive Control and Psychopathology laboratory for many fruitful discussions. Thanks to Carol Cox for assistance with figure preparation.
PY - 2012/2
Y1 - 2012/2
N2 - A core component of cognitive control - the ability to regulate thoughts and actions in accordance with internally represented behavioral goals - might be its intrinsic variability. In this article, I describe the dual mechanisms of control (DMC) framework, which postulates that this variability might arise from qualitative distinctions in temporal dynamics between proactive and reactive modes of control. Proactive control reflects the sustained and anticipatory maintenance of goal-relevant information within lateral prefrontal cortex (PFC) to enable optimal cognitive performance, whereas reactive control reflects transient stimulus-driven goal reactivation that recruits lateral PFC (plus a wider brain network) based on interference demands or episodic associations. I summarize recent research that demonstrates how the DMC framework provides a coherent explanation of three sources of cognitive control variation - intra-individual, inter-individual and between-groups - in terms of proactive versus reactive control biases.
AB - A core component of cognitive control - the ability to regulate thoughts and actions in accordance with internally represented behavioral goals - might be its intrinsic variability. In this article, I describe the dual mechanisms of control (DMC) framework, which postulates that this variability might arise from qualitative distinctions in temporal dynamics between proactive and reactive modes of control. Proactive control reflects the sustained and anticipatory maintenance of goal-relevant information within lateral prefrontal cortex (PFC) to enable optimal cognitive performance, whereas reactive control reflects transient stimulus-driven goal reactivation that recruits lateral PFC (plus a wider brain network) based on interference demands or episodic associations. I summarize recent research that demonstrates how the DMC framework provides a coherent explanation of three sources of cognitive control variation - intra-individual, inter-individual and between-groups - in terms of proactive versus reactive control biases.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84856318346&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.tics.2011.12.010
DO - 10.1016/j.tics.2011.12.010
M3 - Review article
C2 - 22245618
AN - SCOPUS:84856318346
SN - 1364-6613
VL - 16
SP - 106
EP - 113
JO - Trends in Cognitive Sciences
JF - Trends in Cognitive Sciences
IS - 2
ER -