TY - JOUR
T1 - The Spectrum of Quantitative EEG Utilization Across North America
T2 - A Cross-Sectional Survey
AU - Pediatric Quantitative EEG Strategic Taskforce (PedQuEST)
AU - Benedetti, Giulia M.
AU - Morgan, Lindsey A.
AU - Sansevere, Arnold J.
AU - Harrar, Dana B.
AU - Guerriero, Réjean M.
AU - Wainwright, Mark S.
AU - LaRovere, Kerri L.
AU - Kielian, Agnieszka
AU - Ganesan, Saptharishi Lalgudi
AU - Press, Craig A.
N1 - Funding Information:
The survey was designed, tested, and implemented using REDCap (Research Electronic Data Capture) electronic data capture tools 28 hosted at the Institute of Translational Health Sciences. REDCap is a secure, web-based application designed to support data capture for research studies, providing: (1) an intuitive interface for validated data entry; (2) audit trails for tracking data manipulation and export procedures; (3) automated export procedures for seamless data downloads to common statistical packages; and (4) procedures for importing data from external sources. REDCap at Institute of Translational Health Sciences is supported by the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences of the National Institutes of Health under Award Number UL1 TR002319.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 Elsevier Inc.
PY - 2023/4
Y1 - 2023/4
N2 - Background: Continuous electroencephalography (cEEG) is commonly used for neuromonitoring in pediatric intensive care units (PICU); however, there are barriers to real-time interpretation of EEG data. Quantitative EEG (qEEG) transforms the EEG signal into time-compressed graphs, which can be displayed at the bedside. A survey was designed to understand current PICU qEEG use. Methods: An electronic survey was sent to the Pediatric Neurocritical Care Research Group and Pediatric Status Epilepticus Research Group, and intensivists in 16 Canadian PICUs. Questions addressed demographics, qEEG acquisition and storage, clinical use, and education. Results: Fifty respondents from 39 institutions completed the survey (response rate 53% [39 of 74 institutions]), 76% (37 of 50) from the United States and 24% (12 of 50) from Canada. Over half of the institutions (22 of 39 [56%]) utilize qEEG in their ICUs. qEEG use was associated with having a neurocritical care (NCC) service, ≥200 NCC consults/year, ≥1500 ICU admissions/year, and ≥4 ICU EEGs/day (P < 0.05 for all). Nearly all users (92% [24 of 26]) endorsed that qEEG enhanced care of children with acute neurological injury. Lack of training in qEEG was identified as a common barrier [85% (22 of 26)]. Reviewing and reporting of qEEG was not standard at most institutions. Training was required by 14% (three of 22) of institutions, and 32% (seven of 22) had established curricula. Conclusions: ICU qEEG was used at more than half of the institutions surveyed, but review, reporting, and application of this tool remained highly variable. Although providers identify qEEG as a useful tool in patient management, further studies are needed to define clinically meaningful pediatric trends, standardize reporting, and enhance educate bedside providers.
AB - Background: Continuous electroencephalography (cEEG) is commonly used for neuromonitoring in pediatric intensive care units (PICU); however, there are barriers to real-time interpretation of EEG data. Quantitative EEG (qEEG) transforms the EEG signal into time-compressed graphs, which can be displayed at the bedside. A survey was designed to understand current PICU qEEG use. Methods: An electronic survey was sent to the Pediatric Neurocritical Care Research Group and Pediatric Status Epilepticus Research Group, and intensivists in 16 Canadian PICUs. Questions addressed demographics, qEEG acquisition and storage, clinical use, and education. Results: Fifty respondents from 39 institutions completed the survey (response rate 53% [39 of 74 institutions]), 76% (37 of 50) from the United States and 24% (12 of 50) from Canada. Over half of the institutions (22 of 39 [56%]) utilize qEEG in their ICUs. qEEG use was associated with having a neurocritical care (NCC) service, ≥200 NCC consults/year, ≥1500 ICU admissions/year, and ≥4 ICU EEGs/day (P < 0.05 for all). Nearly all users (92% [24 of 26]) endorsed that qEEG enhanced care of children with acute neurological injury. Lack of training in qEEG was identified as a common barrier [85% (22 of 26)]. Reviewing and reporting of qEEG was not standard at most institutions. Training was required by 14% (three of 22) of institutions, and 32% (seven of 22) had established curricula. Conclusions: ICU qEEG was used at more than half of the institutions surveyed, but review, reporting, and application of this tool remained highly variable. Although providers identify qEEG as a useful tool in patient management, further studies are needed to define clinically meaningful pediatric trends, standardize reporting, and enhance educate bedside providers.
KW - Continuous EEG
KW - Critical care
KW - Neuromonitoring
KW - Pediatric neurocritical care
KW - Quantitative EEG
KW - Seizure
KW - Spectral analysis
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85147125490&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.pediatrneurol.2022.12.016
DO - 10.1016/j.pediatrneurol.2022.12.016
M3 - Article
C2 - 36731228
AN - SCOPUS:85147125490
SN - 0887-8994
VL - 141
SP - 1
EP - 8
JO - Pediatric Neurology
JF - Pediatric Neurology
ER -