TY - JOUR
T1 - The social perception of emotional abilities
T2 - Expanding what we know about observer ratings of emotional intelligence
AU - Elfenbein, Hillary Anger
AU - Barsade, Sigal G.
AU - Eisenkraft, Noah
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2015 American Psychological Association.
PY - 2015
Y1 - 2015
N2 - We examine the social perception of emotional intelligence (EI) through the use of observer ratings. Individuals frequently judge others' emotional abilities in real-world settings, yet we know little about the properties of such ratings. This article examines the social perception of EI and expands the evidence to evaluate its reliability and cross-judge agreement, as well as its convergent, divergent, and predictive validity. Three studies use real-world colleagues as observers and data from 2,521 participants. Results indicate significant consensus across observers about targets' EI, moderate but significant self-observer agreement, and modest but relatively consistent discriminant validity across the components of EI. Observer ratings significantly predicted interdependent task performance, even after controlling for numerous factors. Notably, predictive validity was greater for observer-rated than for self-rated or ability-tested EI. We discuss the minimal associations of observer ratings with ability-tested EI, study limitations, future directions, and practical implications.
AB - We examine the social perception of emotional intelligence (EI) through the use of observer ratings. Individuals frequently judge others' emotional abilities in real-world settings, yet we know little about the properties of such ratings. This article examines the social perception of EI and expands the evidence to evaluate its reliability and cross-judge agreement, as well as its convergent, divergent, and predictive validity. Three studies use real-world colleagues as observers and data from 2,521 participants. Results indicate significant consensus across observers about targets' EI, moderate but significant self-observer agreement, and modest but relatively consistent discriminant validity across the components of EI. Observer ratings significantly predicted interdependent task performance, even after controlling for numerous factors. Notably, predictive validity was greater for observer-rated than for self-rated or ability-tested EI. We discuss the minimal associations of observer ratings with ability-tested EI, study limitations, future directions, and practical implications.
KW - Ability tests
KW - Emotional intelligence
KW - Observer ratings
KW - Self-ratings
KW - Social perception
KW - Social relations model
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/84925601555
U2 - 10.1037/a0038436
DO - 10.1037/a0038436
M3 - Article
C2 - 25664949
AN - SCOPUS:84925601555
SN - 1528-3542
VL - 15
SP - 17
EP - 34
JO - Emotion
JF - Emotion
IS - 1
ER -