The Shadow Carceral State and Racial Inequality in Turnout

Ted Enamorado, Anne McDonough, Tali Mendelberg

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    Abstract

    Scholars have studied the carceral state extensively. However, little is known about the 'shadow' carceral state, coercive institutions lacking even the limited safeguards of the carceral state. Pretrial incarceration is one such institution. It often lasts months and causes large resource losses. Yet it is imposed in rushed hearings, with wide discretion for bail judges. These circumstances facilitate quick, heuristic judgments relying on racial stereotypes of marginalized populations. We merge court records from Miami-Dade with voter records to estimate the effect of this 'shadow' institution on turnout. We find that quasi-randomly assigned harsher bail judges depress voting by Black and Hispanic defendants. Consistent with heuristic processing, these racial disparities result only from inexperienced judges. Unlike judge experience, judge race does not matter; minority judges are as likely to impose detention and reduce turnout. The 'shadow' carceral state undermines democratic participation, exacerbating racial inequality.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)1318-1339
    Number of pages22
    JournalBritish Journal of Political Science
    Volume54
    Issue number4
    DOIs
    StatePublished - Oct 1 2024

    Keywords

    • pretrial incarceration
    • racial inequities
    • shadow carceral state
    • turnout

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'The Shadow Carceral State and Racial Inequality in Turnout'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this