TY - JOUR
T1 - The role of radiation therapy and margin width in localized soft-tissue sarcoma
T2 - Analysis from the US Sarcoma Collaborative
AU - Gannon, Nicholas P.
AU - King, David M.
AU - Ethun, Cecilia G.
AU - Charlson, John
AU - Tran, Thuy B.
AU - Poultsides, George
AU - Grignol, Valerie
AU - Howard, J. Harrison
AU - Tseng, Jennifer
AU - Roggin, Kevin K.
AU - Votanopoulos, Konstantinos
AU - Krasnick, Bradley
AU - Fields, Ryan C.
AU - Cardona, Kenneth
AU - Bedi, Meena
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2019 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
PY - 2019/9
Y1 - 2019/9
N2 - Background and Objectives: Soft-tissue sarcomas (STSs) are often treated with resection and radiation (RT)±chemotherapy. The role of RT in decreasing resection width to achieve local control is unclear. We evaluated RT on margin width to achieve local control and local recurrence (LR). Methods: From 2000 to 2016, 514 patients with localized STS were identified from the US Sarcoma Collaborative database. Patients were stratified by a margin and local control was compared amongst treatment groups. Results: LR was 9% with positive, 4.2% with ≤1 mm, and 9.3% with >1 mm margins (P =.315). In the ≤1 mm group, LR was 5.7% without RT, 0% with preoperative RT, and 0% with postoperative RT (P <.0001). In the >1 mm group, LR was 10.2%, 0%, and 3.7% in the no preoperative and postoperative RT groups, respectively (P =.005). RT did not influence LR in patients with positive margins. In stage I-III and II-III patients, local recurrence-free survival was higher following RT (P =.008 and P =.05, respectively). Conclusions: RT may play a larger role in minimizing LR than margin status. In patients with positive margins, RT may decrease LR to similar rates as a negative margin without RT and may be considered to decrease the risk of LR with anticipated close/positive margins.
AB - Background and Objectives: Soft-tissue sarcomas (STSs) are often treated with resection and radiation (RT)±chemotherapy. The role of RT in decreasing resection width to achieve local control is unclear. We evaluated RT on margin width to achieve local control and local recurrence (LR). Methods: From 2000 to 2016, 514 patients with localized STS were identified from the US Sarcoma Collaborative database. Patients were stratified by a margin and local control was compared amongst treatment groups. Results: LR was 9% with positive, 4.2% with ≤1 mm, and 9.3% with >1 mm margins (P =.315). In the ≤1 mm group, LR was 5.7% without RT, 0% with preoperative RT, and 0% with postoperative RT (P <.0001). In the >1 mm group, LR was 10.2%, 0%, and 3.7% in the no preoperative and postoperative RT groups, respectively (P =.005). RT did not influence LR in patients with positive margins. In stage I-III and II-III patients, local recurrence-free survival was higher following RT (P =.008 and P =.05, respectively). Conclusions: RT may play a larger role in minimizing LR than margin status. In patients with positive margins, RT may decrease LR to similar rates as a negative margin without RT and may be considered to decrease the risk of LR with anticipated close/positive margins.
KW - preoperative chemotherapy
KW - preoperative radiation
KW - prognostic
KW - resection
KW - survival
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85070851045&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1002/jso.25522
DO - 10.1002/jso.25522
M3 - Article
C2 - 31172531
AN - SCOPUS:85070851045
SN - 0022-4790
VL - 120
SP - 325
EP - 331
JO - Journal of surgical oncology
JF - Journal of surgical oncology
IS - 3
ER -