TY - JOUR
T1 - The role of psychometrics in individual differences research in cognition
T2 - A case study of the AX-CPT
AU - Cooper, Shelly R.
AU - Gonthier, Corentin
AU - Barch, Deanna M.
AU - Braver, Todd S.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2017 Cooper, Gonthier, Barch and Braver.
PY - 2017/9/4
Y1 - 2017/9/4
N2 - Investigating individual differences in cognition requires addressing questions not often thought about in standard experimental designs, especially regarding the psychometric properties of the task. Using the AX-CPT cognitive control task as a case study example, we address four concerns that one may encounter when researching the topic of individual differences in cognition. First, we demonstrate the importance of variability in task scores, which in turn directly impacts reliability, particularly when comparing correlations in different populations. Second, we demonstrate the importance of variability and reliability for evaluating potential failures to replicate predicted correlations, even within the same population. Third, we demonstrate how researchers can turn to evaluating psychometric properties as a way of evaluating the feasibility of utilizing the task in new settings (e.g., online administration). Lastly, we show how the examination of psychometric properties can help researchers make informed decisions when designing a study, such as determining the appropriate number of trials for a task.
AB - Investigating individual differences in cognition requires addressing questions not often thought about in standard experimental designs, especially regarding the psychometric properties of the task. Using the AX-CPT cognitive control task as a case study example, we address four concerns that one may encounter when researching the topic of individual differences in cognition. First, we demonstrate the importance of variability in task scores, which in turn directly impacts reliability, particularly when comparing correlations in different populations. Second, we demonstrate the importance of variability and reliability for evaluating potential failures to replicate predicted correlations, even within the same population. Third, we demonstrate how researchers can turn to evaluating psychometric properties as a way of evaluating the feasibility of utilizing the task in new settings (e.g., online administration). Lastly, we show how the examination of psychometric properties can help researchers make informed decisions when designing a study, such as determining the appropriate number of trials for a task.
KW - AX-CPT
KW - Psychometrics
KW - Reliability
KW - Replication
KW - Task design
KW - Variability
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85028748499&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01482
DO - 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01482
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85028748499
SN - 1664-1078
VL - 8
JO - Frontiers in Psychology
JF - Frontiers in Psychology
IS - SEP
M1 - 1482
ER -