Abstract
The results of revision total knee arthroplasty (TKA) in which a well- fixed patellar component was left in place (retained) were compared with those in which the patellar component was revised to a cemented all- polyethylene component. The patella was retained in 34 cases, 12 of which were metal-backed, and was revised in 39 cases. Data collected on all patients included a Knee Society clinical and radiographic score, SF36, a patellofemoral questionnaire, and a satisfaction survey. There were no differences in clinical score, responses to specific patellofemoral questions, or patient satisfaction between the 2 groups. Retaining a well- fixed patellar component at the time of revision TKA appears to be a viable option with equivalent short-term results to those obtained when the patellar component is revised.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 413-417 |
| Number of pages | 5 |
| Journal | Journal of Arthroplasty |
| Volume | 15 |
| Issue number | 4 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - 2000 |
Keywords
- Knee arthroplasty
- Patellar resurfacing
- Revision
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'The results of retaining a well-fixed patellar component in revision total knee arthroplasty'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver