The results of retaining a well-fixed patellar component in revision total knee arthroplasty

Robert L. Barrack, Cecil Rorabeck, Paul Partington, Jaswin Sawhney, Gerard Engh

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

28 Scopus citations

Abstract

The results of revision total knee arthroplasty (TKA) in which a well- fixed patellar component was left in place (retained) were compared with those in which the patellar component was revised to a cemented all- polyethylene component. The patella was retained in 34 cases, 12 of which were metal-backed, and was revised in 39 cases. Data collected on all patients included a Knee Society clinical and radiographic score, SF36, a patellofemoral questionnaire, and a satisfaction survey. There were no differences in clinical score, responses to specific patellofemoral questions, or patient satisfaction between the 2 groups. Retaining a well- fixed patellar component at the time of revision TKA appears to be a viable option with equivalent short-term results to those obtained when the patellar component is revised.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)413-417
Number of pages5
JournalJournal of Arthroplasty
Volume15
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - 2000

Keywords

  • Knee arthroplasty
  • Patellar resurfacing
  • Revision

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The results of retaining a well-fixed patellar component in revision total knee arthroplasty'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this