The rectosigmoid index

M. J. Siegel; G. D. Shackelford; W. H. McAlister

doi:10.1148/radiology.139.2.7220897

The rectosigmoid index

M. J. Siegel, G. D. Shackelford, W. H. McAlister

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

11 Scopus citations

Abstract

Case material was reviewed to determine the value of the rectosigmoid index in the diagnosis of both segmental and total-colon aganglionosis in infants less than one month old. Data indicate that a rectosigmoid index higher than 0.9 may rule out a diagnosis of rectosigmoid aganglionosis but may be a misleading indicator of longer segment or total-colon aganglionosis.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	497-499
Number of pages	3
Journal	Radiology
Volume	139
Issue number	2
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1148/radiology.139.2.7220897
State	Published - Jan 1 1981

Access to Document

10.1148/radiology.139.2.7220897

Cite this

@article{938cb299f65145b894bc73d832be0da7,

title = "The rectosigmoid index",

abstract = "Case material was reviewed to determine the value of the rectosigmoid index in the diagnosis of both segmental and total-colon aganglionosis in infants less than one month old. Data indicate that a rectosigmoid index higher than 0.9 may rule out a diagnosis of rectosigmoid aganglionosis but may be a misleading indicator of longer segment or total-colon aganglionosis.",

author = "Siegel, {M. J.} and Shackelford, {G. D.} and McAlister, {W. H.}",

year = "1981",

month = jan,

day = "1",

doi = "10.1148/radiology.139.2.7220897",

language = "English",

volume = "139",

pages = "497--499",

journal = "Radiology",

issn = "0033-8419",

number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The rectosigmoid index

AU - Siegel, M. J.

AU - Shackelford, G. D.

AU - McAlister, W. H.

PY - 1981/1/1

Y1 - 1981/1/1

N2 - Case material was reviewed to determine the value of the rectosigmoid index in the diagnosis of both segmental and total-colon aganglionosis in infants less than one month old. Data indicate that a rectosigmoid index higher than 0.9 may rule out a diagnosis of rectosigmoid aganglionosis but may be a misleading indicator of longer segment or total-colon aganglionosis.

AB - Case material was reviewed to determine the value of the rectosigmoid index in the diagnosis of both segmental and total-colon aganglionosis in infants less than one month old. Data indicate that a rectosigmoid index higher than 0.9 may rule out a diagnosis of rectosigmoid aganglionosis but may be a misleading indicator of longer segment or total-colon aganglionosis.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0019500928&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1148/radiology.139.2.7220897

DO - 10.1148/radiology.139.2.7220897

M3 - Article

C2 - 7220897

AN - SCOPUS:0019500928

SN - 0033-8419

VL - 139

SP - 497

EP - 499

JO - Radiology

JF - Radiology

IS - 2

ER -

The rectosigmoid index

Abstract

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this